Dental post-operative sensitivity associated with a gallium-based restorative material

被引:19
作者
Dunne, SM [1 ]
Abraham, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, GKT Dent Inst, Dept Conservat Dent, London SE5 9RW, England
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4800755a
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction This study forms part of a 2-year longitudinal clinical trial to compare the performance of a gallium-based restorative material (Galloy) with a high copper, mercury based (Dispersalloy) control material. Method Following Ethical Committee approval, 25 galley restorations and 25 Dispersalloy controls were placed in 14 adult patients, by a single operator. The cavities were of moderate size, indicating the use of amalgam as the restorative material. All restorations were polished within 1 week of placement, photographed and a silicone impression of the tooth and restoration recorded. In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS), indicating the extent of any post-operative sensitivity, was completed by each patient for each restoration, immediately prior to polishing. A score of 0 indicated no sensitivity, while a score of 10 indicated the greatest possible sensitivity. At B-month recall, the VAS scores, silicone impressions and photographs were repeated. Results The mean sensitivity scores for the galley and Dispersalloy restorations at 1 week were 5.1 (+/-3.4) and 1.0 (+/-1.5), respectively and at 6 months, 1.8 (+/-3.0) and 0.2 (+/-0.1) respectively. The differences between these means at 1 week and at 6 months were significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion Galley restorations were associated with a much greater severity of post-operative sensitivity than Dispersalloy restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 313
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   ALTERATION IN PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS IN PRIMARY CULTURES OF RAT-KIDNEY PROXIMAL TUBULE EPITHELIAL-CELLS BY EXPOSURE TO GALLIUM, INDIUM, AND ARSENITE [J].
AOKI, Y ;
LIPSKY, MM ;
FOWLER, BA .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 106 (03) :462-468
[2]   THE PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF A GALLIUM ALLOY RESTORATIVE MATERIAL [J].
BLAIR, FM ;
WHITWORTH, JM ;
MCCABE, JF .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (04) :277-280
[3]  
CLARK GE, 1990, TOOTH HYPERSENSITIVI, pR9
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF ADULT CANCER PAIN - SHORTCOMINGS OF CURRENT METHODS [J].
DESCHAMPS, M ;
BAND, PR ;
COLDMAN, AJ .
PAIN, 1988, 32 (02) :133-139
[5]  
Dunne S M, 1997, Int Dent J, V47, P123
[6]   THE USE OF TOPICAL GUANETHIDINE IN THE RELIEF OF DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY [J].
DUNNE, SM ;
HANNINGTONKIFF, JG .
PAIN, 1993, 54 (02) :165-168
[7]   GALLIUM INHIBITS BONE-RESORPTION BY A DIRECT EFFECT ON OSTEOCLASTS [J].
HALL, TJ ;
CHAMBERS, TJ .
BONE AND MINERAL, 1990, 8 (03) :211-216
[8]  
HERO H, 1994, CELL MATER, V4, P409
[9]  
Huskisson EC., 1983, PAIN MEASUREMENT ASS, P33
[10]  
KAGA M, 1992, J JPN SOC DENT MAT, V11, P740