Low-cost finite element method-based reliability analysis using adjusted control variate technique

被引:12
作者
Rashki, Mohsen [1 ]
Ghavidel, Alireza [2 ]
Arab, Hamed Ghohani [2 ]
Mousavi, Seyed Roohollah [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sistan & Baluchestan, Dept Architecture Engn, Zahedan, Iran
[2] Univ Sistan & Baluchestan, Dept Civil Engn, Zahedan, Iran
关键词
Finite element method; Mesh density; Reliability analysis; Control variate technique; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SIMULATION METHOD; VALIDATION; MODEL; VERIFICATION; CONVERGENCE; PROBABILITY; FAILURE; SPINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.11.005
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Reliability analysis is used to evaluate the safety of engineering structures subject to uncertainties. Finite element method (FEM) is a popular engineering tool used to evaluate the reliability of complex engineering structures. In general, FEM -based reliability analysis of engineering structures is influenced by the mesh density of the model and the accuracy of the results requires the use of a very fine mesh density in the analysis. However, it is often impractical for reliability analysis complex structures, especially those with low failure probabilities. Hence, a new method is proposed to address this issue, which provides an accurate estimate of the failure probability at low computational cost. In this method, the control variate technique is used in conjunction with the FEM-based reliability analysis, where the failure probability integral is broken down into two separate integral terms. The first term provides a low-cost estimate of the failure probability using a model with coarse mesh density, whereas the second term regulates the failure probability based on fewer finite element analyses with fine mesh density. The adjusted correction factors are also presented in this paper in order to improve the efficiency of the proposed approach. The proposed approach is used to estimate the reliability index of four engineering structures and the results show that the method is efficient and practical for FEM-based reliability analysis of engineering structures. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Convergence of Finite Element Model for Crushing of a Conical Thin-walled Tube
    Ahmad, M.
    Ismail, K. A.
    Mat, F.
    [J]. MALAYSIAN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITIES CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY 2012 (MUCET 2012), 2013, 53 : 586 - 593
  • [2] Arab H.G., 2013, Int. J. Optimiz. Civ. Eng., V3, P635
  • [3] A fast and robust method for estimating the failure probability of structures
    Arab, Hamed Ghohani
    Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 168 (04) : 298 - 309
  • [4] BRITTLE-FRACTURE RELIABILITY BY PROBABILISTIC FINITE-ELEMENTS
    BESTERFIELD, GH
    LIU, WK
    LAWRENCE, MA
    BELYTSCHKO, TB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1990, 116 (03): : 642 - 659
  • [5] Bower AF., 2009, Applied mechanics of solids, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781439802489
  • [6] Automated finite element meshing of the lumbar spine: Verification and validation with 18 specimen-specific models
    Campbell, J. Q.
    Coombs, D. J.
    Rao, M.
    Rullkoetter, P. J.
    Petrella, A. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 49 (13) : 2669 - 2676
  • [7] An effective mesh strategy for CFD modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
    Choopanya, P.
    Yang, Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (15) : 6445 - 6456
  • [8] Reliability analysis with Metamodel Line Sampling
    Depina, Ivan
    Le, Thi Minh Hue
    Fenton, Gordon
    Eiksund, Gudmund
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2016, 60 : 1 - 15
  • [9] Der Kiureghian A, 1998, PROB ENG MECH, V3
  • [10] A comparison between Monte Carlo and FORMS in calculating the reliability of a composite structure
    Di Sciuva, M
    Lomario, D
    [J]. COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2003, 59 (01) : 155 - 162