Effects of pre-existing abdominal scar on postoperative complications after autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Chung, Jae-Ho [1 ]
Sohn, Sung-Min [1 ]
Jung, Seung-Pil [2 ]
Park, Seung-Ha [1 ]
Yoon, Eul-Sik [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ Hosp, Div Breast & Endocrine Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Scar; Complications; Flap; INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR; CT-ANGIOGRAPHY; TRAM FLAP; PFANNENSTIEL SCARS; ANATOMY; TISSUE; IMPACT; WOMEN; WALL;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A previous abdominal scar is generally considered as a challenge for breast reconstruction using abdominal flaps. Since it may interfere with the perfusion of abdominal tissue and weaken the abdominal fascia, many plastic surgeons are concerned about the theoretical risk of postoperative complications. This study aims to assess the effects of previous scar on complications in abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction. Methods: This systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline using MEDLINE, Ovid, and Cochrane databases in March 2020. All studies comparing the complication rates between patients with previous abdominal scars and control group without a scar were included. However, articles such as case series fewer than 10 patients, letters and animal studies were excluded. Results: A total of 2109 patients underwent 2792 abdominal flap tissue transfers for breast reconstruction in the 11 studies reviewed. A previous scar increased the risk of overall flap complications (RR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.32; fixed-effect model, I-2 = 13%) and donor-site complications (RR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.62; fixed-effect model, I-2 = 42%, p > 0.05). In particular, the risk of donor-site wound problem was significantly higher than that in the control group (RR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.35-2.46; fixed-effect model, I-2 = 19%, p > 0.05). Conclusions: This study result showed that the previous scar increased the risk for all types of complications compared with the control group. In patients with a vertical midline scar, it requires careful preoperative planning with CT angiography and attentive follow-up. However, with careful preoperative planning and an appropriate strategy, it is possible to overcome the detrimental effect of previous scar. (C) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 289
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Circummuscular variant of the deep inferior epigastric perforator in breast reconstruction: Importance of preoperative multidetector computed tomographic angiography
    Heo, Chanyeong
    Yoo, Jihan
    Minn, Kyungwon
    Kim, Sungwon
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2008, 32 (05) : 817 - 819
  • [12] A NEW APPROACH TO PREEXISTING VERTICAL MIDLINE ABDOMINAL SCARS WITH CROSSOVER DIEP FLAP BREAST RECONSTRUCTION
    Hsieh, Frank
    Somia, Naveen
    Lam, Thomas C.
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2010, 30 (02) : 151 - 155
  • [13] An algorithmic approach to abdominal flap breast reconstruction in patients with pre-existing scars - results from a single surgeon's experience
    Hsieh, Frank
    Kumiponjera, Devor
    Malata, Charles M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (12) : 1650 - 1660
  • [14] The Influence of a Pfannenstiel Scar on Venous Anatomy of the Lower Abdominal Wall and Implications for Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, So Young
    Lee, Kyeong-Tae
    Mun, Goo-Hyun
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (03) : 540 - 548
  • [15] TIPS AND TRICKS FOR DIEP FLAP BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS ABDOMINAL SCAR
    Laporta, Rosaria
    Longo, Benedetto
    Sorotos, Michail
    di Pompeo, Fabio Santanelli
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2017, 37 (04) : 282 - 292
  • [16] Importance of right subcostal incisions in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstruction
    Losken, A
    Carlson, GW
    Jones, GE
    Culbertson, JH
    Schoemann, M
    Bostwick, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2002, 49 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [17] Are Pfannenstiel Scars a Boon or a Curse for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions?
    Mahajan, Ajay L.
    Zeltzer, Assaf
    Claes, Karel E. Y.
    Van Landuyt, Koenraad
    Hamdi, Moustapha
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (04) : 797 - 805
  • [18] CT-guided deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap localization - Better for the patient, the surgeon, and the hospital
    Malhotra, A.
    Chhaya, N.
    Nsiah-Sarbeng, P.
    Mosahebi, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [19] Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
  • [20] The Role of CT Angiography in Assessing Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Patency in Patients With Pre-existing Abdominal Scars
    Ngaage, Ledibabari M.
    Hamed, Raed
    Oni, Georgette
    Di Pace, Bruno
    Ghorra, Dina T.
    Koo, Brendan C.
    Malata, Charles M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 235 : 58 - 65