Biomechanical design of Less Invasive Stabilization System femoral plates: Computational evaluation of the fracture environment

被引:8
作者
Reina-Romo, Esther [1 ]
Giraldez-Sanchez, M. A. [2 ]
Mora-Macias, J. [1 ]
Cano-Luis, P. [2 ]
Dominguez, Jaime [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Mech Engn, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Dept Traumatol, Seville, Spain
关键词
Less Invasive Stabilization System; femoral plate; biomechanics; finite element; femoral fracture; TROCHANTERIC GAMMA-NAIL; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; LOCKING PLATE; MECHANICAL CONDITIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; INTERNAL-FIXATION; FEMUR FRACTURES; SCREW PLACEMENT; LISS; BONE;
D O I
10.1177/0954411914554634
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Less Invasive Stabilization System femoral plates are currently accepted as a suitable fixation technique for supra-intercondylar femoral fractures. However, general agreement does not exist regarding the optimum design of this fixator type. Therefore, the aim of this article is to reduce the intrinsic Less Invasive Stabilization System complications by clarifying, from a biomechanical point of view, how the number of screws, the screw connection type (unicortical or bicortical), or the structured position of the screws can influence the outcome of the fracture site. These studies include a specific finite element analysis that determines how several biomechanical variables, such as the movement at the fracture site, are influenced by the preconditions of bone healing. The results of this study show that the screw type affects the mechanical stabilization of the femur to a greater extent than the material type of the Less Invasive Stabilization System femoral plates. The most significant differences among all the analyzed configurations are observed in the shear interfragmentary strain between screw types. Values are approximately 50% higher with unicortical screws than with bicortical ones.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1052
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Biomechanical Analysis of the Less Invasive Stabilization System for Mechanically Unstable Fractures of the Distal Femur: Comparison of Titanium Versus Stainless Steel and Bicortical Versus Unicortical Fixation [J].
Beingessner, Daphne ;
Moon, Edward ;
Barei, David ;
Morshed, Saam .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 71 (03) :620-624
[2]   In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity [J].
Burr, DB ;
Milgrom, C ;
Fyhrie, D ;
Forwood, M ;
Nyska, M ;
Finestone, A ;
Hoshaw, S ;
Saiag, E ;
Simkin, A .
BONE, 1996, 18 (05) :405-410
[3]  
Cantu RV, 2008, TECH KNEE SURG, V7, P131
[4]  
Cegonino J., 2004, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, V7, P245, DOI 10.1080/10255840412331307182
[5]   Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty [J].
Chen, Shih-Hao ;
Chiang, Ming-Chieh ;
Hung, Ching-Hua ;
Lin, Shang-Chih ;
Chang, Hsiao-Wei .
KNEE, 2014, 21 (01) :224-231
[6]   The role of interfragmentary strain on the rate of bone healing-A new interpretation and mathematical model [J].
Comiskey, D. P. ;
MacDonald, B. J. ;
McCartney, W. T. ;
Synnott, K. ;
O'Byrne, J. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 43 (14) :2830-2834
[7]   Locked Plating: Biomechanics and Biology [J].
Dickson, Kyle F. ;
Munz, John W. .
TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 22 (04) :E1-E6
[8]   Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: A cadaveric model [J].
Dougherty, Paul J. ;
Kim, Do-Gyoon ;
Meisterling, Steve ;
Wybo, Christopher ;
Yeni, Yener .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2008, 22 (06) :399-403
[9]   Mechanical conditions in the internal stabilization of proximal tibial defects [J].
Duda, GN ;
Mandruzzato, F ;
Heller, M ;
Kassi, JP ;
Khodadadyan, C ;
Haas, NP .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (01) :64-72
[10]  
Evans F.G., 1973, MECH PROPERTIES BONE