Think Tanks and the Media: How the Conservative Movement Gained Entry Into the Education Policy Arena

被引:35
作者
McDonald, Lauren [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Northridge, Dept Sociol, Northridge, CA 91330 USA
关键词
conservative movement; education policy; media; neoliberal; neoconservative; think tanks; DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION; POLITICS; ENLIGHTENMENT; LEGITIMACY;
D O I
10.1177/0895904813492372
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This research examines how the conservative movement has used both conservative think tanks and the media to gain entry into the field of education policy. The study examines how the conservative movement has attempted to use think tanks as legitimating organizations to enter the education policy arena by (a) measuring the historical growth in the number of conservative think tanks focused on education policy, (b) situating that growth within the larger context of efforts on the part of the conservative movement to bring free market ideas to education, and (c) analyzing and comparing conservative think tank media presence to that of centrist and progressive think tanks and university-based education-policy centers. Findings indicate that conservative think tanks produced the largest number of education media citations, followed by centrist think tanks. Liberal/progressive think tanks and university-based education-policy centers had little to no media presence.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 880
页数:36
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   War programming: The propaganda project and the Iraq War [J].
Altheide, DL ;
Grimes, JN .
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2005, 46 (04) :617-643
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, I ORG IDEAS INTEREST
[3]  
[Anonymous], WASHINGTON POST 0205
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, BRIEF HIST NEOLIBERA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1980, FREE CHOOSE PERSONAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ORG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WASH POST
[8]  
[Anonymous], ASSAULT PUBLIC ED CO
[9]  
Apple M., 2006, ED RIGHT WAY MARKETS, V2nd
[10]   Democratic education in neoliberal and neoconservative times [J].
Apple, Michael W. .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2011, 21 (01) :21-31