A TWO-PHASED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR SELECTING THE BEST SMARTPHONE

被引:13
作者
Yildiz, A. [1 ]
Ergul, E. U. [2 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Dept Automot Engn, Fac Technol, Amasya, Turkey
[2] Amasya Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Fac Technol, Amasya, Turkey
关键词
ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; SUPPLIER SELECTION; PROCESS ANP; CHOQUET; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.7166/26-3-1208
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the last 20 years, rapid and significant developments have occurred in communication and information technologies. In parallel with these developments, the importance of smartphones has increased. In addition, many smartphone manufacturers have launched and continue to launch a number of new models with many features. People who want to buy a new smartphone have difficulties selecting the best smartphone among the numerous models available on the technology markets. Therefore, smartphone selection has become a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem for people. Hence, decision-making processes will be facilitated by using MCDM methods, and these will provide the most appropriate decision. In this paper, the best smartphone among the 28 alternatives determined by the person who will buy them are selected by using three main criteria and 17 sub-criteria with the help of a two-phased MCDM approach. In the first phase, 28 smartphone alternatives are ranked using the analytic network process (ANP). In the second phase, a model that includes the best four alternatives of ANP is created. Afterwards, the best smartphone is selected using the generalised Choquet integral (GCI) method according to this model. Finally, the findings and the results are given.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 215
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Proposal Based on Kemira-M with Four Criteria Groups [J].
Ay, Sefacan ;
Can, Gulin Feryal ;
Toktas, Pelin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2023, 22 (03) :991-1032
[42]   A new DEA common-weight multi-criteria decision-making approach for technology selection [J].
Chu, Junfei ;
Wu, Jie ;
Chu, Chengbin ;
Liu, Ming .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (12) :3686-3700
[43]   Application of multi-criteria decision-making approach for ascertaining the avulsion potentiality of the Torsa River course [J].
Saha, Ujwal Deep ;
Bhattacharya, Soma .
MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7 (02) :643-667
[44]   Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: An entropy-based approach to assess tourism sustainability [J].
Andriam, Joseph ;
di Tollo, Giacomo ;
Pesenti, Raffaele .
TOURISM ECONOMICS, 2021, 27 (01) :168-186
[45]   Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to select appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production [J].
Firouzi, Saeed ;
Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh ;
Isazadeh, Mohammadreza ;
Nikkhah, Amin ;
Van Haute, Sam .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 770
[46]   Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Engineering Applications [J].
Nabavi, Seyed Reza ;
Wang, Zhiyuan ;
Rangaiah, Gade Pandu .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 62 (17) :6707-6722
[47]   A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification [J].
Nieto-Morote, Ana ;
Ruz-Vila, Francisco .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 25 :8-19
[48]   A systematic review of multi-criteria decision-making applications in reverse logistics [J].
Rezaei, Jafar .
18TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT 2015, 2015, 10 :766-776
[49]   Evaluation of the Difficulties in the Internet of Things (IoT) with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making [J].
Uslu, Buse ;
Eren, Tamer ;
Gur, Seyda ;
Ozcan, Evrencan .
PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (03)
[50]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING FOR SOLVING TRANSPORT SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES: AN OVERVIEW [J].
Siksnelyte-butkiene, Indre ;
Streimikiene, Dalia ;
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Agnusdei, Leonardo .
TRANSPORT, 2024, 39 (03) :264-286