A TWO-PHASED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR SELECTING THE BEST SMARTPHONE

被引:13
作者
Yildiz, A. [1 ]
Ergul, E. U. [2 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Dept Automot Engn, Fac Technol, Amasya, Turkey
[2] Amasya Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Fac Technol, Amasya, Turkey
关键词
ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; SUPPLIER SELECTION; PROCESS ANP; CHOQUET; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.7166/26-3-1208
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the last 20 years, rapid and significant developments have occurred in communication and information technologies. In parallel with these developments, the importance of smartphones has increased. In addition, many smartphone manufacturers have launched and continue to launch a number of new models with many features. People who want to buy a new smartphone have difficulties selecting the best smartphone among the numerous models available on the technology markets. Therefore, smartphone selection has become a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem for people. Hence, decision-making processes will be facilitated by using MCDM methods, and these will provide the most appropriate decision. In this paper, the best smartphone among the 28 alternatives determined by the person who will buy them are selected by using three main criteria and 17 sub-criteria with the help of a two-phased MCDM approach. In the first phase, 28 smartphone alternatives are ranked using the analytic network process (ANP). In the second phase, a model that includes the best four alternatives of ANP is created. Afterwards, the best smartphone is selected using the generalised Choquet integral (GCI) method according to this model. Finally, the findings and the results are given.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 215
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH THAT COMBINES FUZZY TOPSIS AND DEA METHODOLOGIES [J].
Taylan, O. ;
Alidrisi, H. ;
Kabli, M. .
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 25 (03) :39-56
[2]   A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Selecting the Best Project Delivery Systems for Offsite Construction Projects [J].
Assaf, Mohamed ;
Hussein, Mohamed ;
Abdelkhalek, Sherif ;
Zayed, Tarek .
BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (02)
[3]   A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Choose the Best Option for Sustainable Construction Management [J].
Erdogan, Seyit Ali ;
Saparauskas, Jonas ;
Turskis, Zenonas .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08)
[4]   Hospital performance management: A multi-criteria decision-making approach [J].
Tyagi, Aman ;
Singh, Preetvanti .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (04) :286-291
[5]   A group multi-criteria decision-making based on best-worst method [J].
Safarzadeh, Soroush ;
Khansefid, Saba ;
Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 126 :111-121
[6]   Selecting the best lead-free solder paste supplier using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology [J].
Tsai T.-N. ;
Wang L.-W. .
Journal of Quality, 2020, 27 (02) :83-108
[7]   Handling veracity in multi-criteria decision-making: A multi-dimensional approach [J].
De Tre, Guy ;
De Mol, Robin ;
Bronselaer, Antoon .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 :541-554
[8]   Using multi-criteria decision making for selecting picking strategies [J].
Hernandez, Liseth Contreras ;
Jimenez G., Hanser S. ;
Dantas, Priscilla P. L. ;
Cavalcante, Cristiano A. V. .
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (04) :3265-3290
[9]   Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Technique [J].
Rauf, Mudassar ;
Guan, Zailin ;
Sarfraz, Shoaib ;
Mumtaz, Jabir ;
Almaiman, Sulaiman ;
Shehab, Essam ;
Jahanzaib, Mirza .
ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXII, 2018, 8 :343-348
[10]   A multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting a suitable maintenance strategy for public buildings using sustainability criteria [J].
Ighravwe, Desmond Eseoghene ;
Oke, Sunday Ayoola .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2019, 24