Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election

被引:243
作者
Whitehead, Andrew L. [1 ]
Perry, Samuel L. [2 ]
Baker, Joseph O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] East Tennessee State Univ, Johnson City, TN USA
关键词
Christian nationalism; 2016 presidential election; Donald Trump; voting; xenophobia; Islamophobia; sexism; CIVIL RELIGION; BOUNDARIES; ATTITUDES; MEDIATION; DIVERSITY; IDENTITY; GOD;
D O I
10.1093/socrel/srx070
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Why did Americans vote for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential election? Social scientists have proposed a variety of explanations, including economic dissatisfaction, sexism, racism, Islamophobia, and xenophobia. The current study establishes that, independent of these influences, voting for Trump was, at least for many Americans, a symbolic defense of the United States' perceived Christian heritage. Data from a national probability sample of Americans surveyed soon after the 2016 election shows that greater adherence to Christian nationalist ideology was a robust predictor of voting for 'Rump, even after controlling for economic dissatisfaction, sexism, anti-black prejudice, anti-Muslim refugee attitudes, and anti-immigrant sentiment, as well as measures of religion, sociodemographics, and political identity more generally. These findings indicate that Christian nationalist ideology-although correlated with a variety of class-based, sexist, racist, and ethnocentric views-is not synonymous with, reducible to, or strictly epiphenomenal of such views. Rather, Christian nationalism operates as a unique and independent ideology that can influence political actions by calling forth a defense of mythological narratives about America's distinctively Christian heritage and future.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 171
页数:25
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2008, DO RESP RAT MATT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Christianity Today
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, WASHINGTON POST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, C US EL 2016 DOM INT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MOR CHRIST SEE AM DA
[7]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES
[8]   The Fringe Effect: Civil Society Organizations and the Evolution of Media Discourse about Islam since the September 11th Attacks [J].
Bail, Christopher A. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 77 (06) :855-879
[9]  
Barkun Michael., 1997, Religion and the Racist Right: The Origins of the Christian Identity Movement
[10]  
BELLAH RN, 1967, DAEDALUS, V96, P1