Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review

被引:51
作者
Davies, Nathan [1 ,2 ]
Schiowitz, Brooke [1 ]
Rait, Greta [3 ]
Vickerstaff, Victoria [2 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Ageing Populat Studies, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Rowland Hill St, London NW3 2PF, England
[2] UCL, Ctr Dementia Palliat Care Res, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Div Psychiat, Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, England
[3] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Priment Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[4] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust Liais, Sterling Way, London, England
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; decision-making; decision aid; decision support tool; FEEDING OPTIONS; PEOPLE; LIFE; END; INTERVENTION; PATIENT; DELPHI; GOALS;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610219000826
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to critically evaluate decision aids developed for practitioners and caregivers when providing care for someone with dementia or for use by people with dementia themselves. Decision aids may be videos, booklets, or web-based tools that explicitly state the decision, provide information about the decision, and summarize options along with associated benefits and harms. This helps guide the decision maker through clarifying the values they place on the benefits or harms of the options. Design: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature in electronic databases (CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO) in March 2018. Reference lists were searched for relevant papers and citations tracked. Data were synthesized with meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Papers were included if they met the following criteria: 1) the focus of the paper was on the evaluation of a decision aid; 2) the decision aid was used in dementia care; and 3) the decision aid was aimed at professionals, people with dementia, or caregivers. Results: We identified 3618 studies, and 10 studies were included, covering three topics across six decision aids: 1) support with eating/feeding options, 2) place of care, and 3) goals of care. The mode of delivery and format of the decision aids varied and included paper-based, video-based, and audio-based decision aids. The decision aids were shown to be effective, increasing knowledge and the quality of communication. The meta-analysis demonstrated that decisions are effective in reducing decisional conflict among caregivers (standardized mean difference = -0.50, 95% confidence interval [ - 0.97, - 0.02]). Conclusion: Decision aids offer a promising approach for providing support for decision-making in dementia care. People are often faced with more than one decision, and decisions are often interrelated. The decision aids identified in this review focus on single topics. There is a need for decision aids that cover multiple topics in one aid to reflect this complexity and better support caregivers.
引用
收藏
页码:1403 / 1419
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CASP RAND CONTR TRIA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J HOSP PALLIAT NURS, V20, pE1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, KIDNEY INT, V6, pS1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OBSTET GYNECOL, V13, pe49
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, END LIF CAR STRAT PR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STAT STAT SOFTW REL
[7]  
Barker S, 2017, INT J PALLIAT NURS, V23, P446, DOI 10.12968/ijpn.2017.23.9.446
[8]  
Bayer A., 2015, BROCKLEHURSTS TXB GE, P392
[9]   Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis [J].
Bunn, Frances ;
Goodman, Claire ;
Russell, Bridget ;
Wilson, Patricia ;
Manthorpe, Jill ;
Rait, Greta ;
Hodkinson, Isabel ;
Durand, Marie-Anne .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2018, 18
[10]  
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2018, CASP QUALITATIVE CHE