Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule

被引:35
作者
Gillies, Richard S. [1 ]
Stratford, Jane M.
Booth, Michael I.
Dehn, Thomas C. B.
机构
[1] Royal Berkshire Hosp, Dept Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Reading RG1 5AN, Berks, England
[2] Royal Berkshire Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Physiol, Reading RG1 5AN, Berks, England
关键词
Bravo; daily activities; discomfort; gastro-oesophageal reflux; disease diagnosis; pH monitoring;
D O I
10.1097/MEG.0b013e3280116eec
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Oesophageal pH monitoring is the current standard for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The Bravo capsule allows 48-h monitoring the need for a naso-oesophageal catheter. Our aim was assess the Bravo capsule in terms of patient discomfort and interference with daily activities, and to determine if 48-h Bravo pH studies facilitate the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Methods: Ambulatory pH studies were performed at two hospitals using either the Bravo capsule (n=100) or a conventional naso-oesophageal catheter (n=100). Participants were selected either for investigation of symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, or to follow-up antireflux surgery. All participants completed questionnaires to assess discomfort and interference with daily activities. Results: Eighty-nine Bravo studies recorded at least 48 h of data, and 95 were diagnostic. Bravo participants reported significantly less discomfort during insertion (P < 0.0001) and monitoring (P < 0.0001), and less interference with daily activities (P < 0.0001), eating (P < 0.005), sleeping (P < 0.0001) and work (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between day 1 and 2 median total time pH < 4 (4.0 and 4.3%, P=0.64), erect time PH < 4 (5.0 and 5.0%, P=0.56), supine time PH < 4 (0.5 and 0.5%, P=0.23), and Johnson-DeMeester scores (15.9 and 16.2, P=0.90). Ten Bravo participants (10%) were diagnosed with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease using day 2 data after a normal day 1. Conclusions: The Bravo capsule significantly reduces the patient discomfort and interference with normal daily activities during pH monitoring associated with a naso-oesophageal catheter. Moreover, 48-h Bravo studies offer an advantage over conventional 24-h studies in diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Antoniazzi L, 2002, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V122, pA338
[2]   Wireless pH testing as an adjunct to unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy: The safety and efficacy of transnasal telemetry capsule placement [J].
Belafsky, PC ;
Allen, K ;
Rosario, LCD ;
Roseman, D .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2004, 131 (01) :26-28
[3]   Patient self-assessment of test-day symptoms in 24-h pH-metry for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Booth, MI ;
Stratford, J ;
Dehn, TCB .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 36 (08) :795-799
[4]  
Bortolotti M, 2004, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V126, pA320
[5]   Pull a few strings [J].
Chaudhary, A ;
Day, T ;
Fender, K ;
Fendrick, L ;
McCall, J .
IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2003, 9 (06) :34-39
[6]   Progression or regression of Barrett's esophagsus - It all in the eye of the beholder? [J].
Dekel, R ;
Wakelin, DE ;
Wendel, C ;
Green, C ;
Sampliner, RE ;
Garewal, HS ;
Martinez, P ;
Fass, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (12) :2612-2615
[7]   Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo) [J].
des Varannes, SB ;
Mion, F ;
Ducrotté, P ;
Zerbib, F ;
Denis, P ;
Ponchon, T ;
Thibault, R ;
Galmiche, JP .
GUT, 2005, 54 (12) :1682-1686
[8]   Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities [J].
Fass, R ;
Hell, R ;
Sampliner, RE ;
Pulliam, G ;
Graver, E ;
Hartz, V ;
Johnson, C ;
Jaffe, P .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1999, 44 (11) :2263-2269
[9]   CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING IN THE EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX - DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT (DATTA) [J].
GLADE, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (08) :662-668
[10]  
JOHNSON LF, 1974, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V62, P325