The role of meta-analyses in assessing cancer treatments

被引:11
|
作者
Sylvester, R [1 ]
Collette, L [1 ]
Duchateau, L [1 ]
机构
[1] EORTC Data Ctr, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
randomised clinical trials; cancer clinical trials; meta-analysis; overview; systematic review; individual patient data; literature search; publication bias; selection bias; intergroup trials;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00125-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The results of individual phase III cancer clinical trials are often inconclusive due to the overly optimistic size of treatment differences that are sought. Increased power and precision can generally be obtained if the data from several different trials studying the same or similar questions are analysed together. Individual patient data meta-analyses, which combine together the quantitative results from all properly randomised studies, provide an overall estimate of the size of treatment differences. Individual patient data meta-analyses have played an especially important role in breast and gastrointestinal tract cancers where many important questions have been addressed. Although meta-analyses have been subject to considerable criticism, individual patient data meta-analyses provide the best overall evidence of treatment effect in the absence of large-scale trials and have been instrumental in providing objective data that can be used in the design of new studies. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1358
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Meta-analysis: Fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses
    Huf, Wolfgang
    Kalcher, Klaudius
    Pail, Gerald
    Friedrich, Michaela-Elena
    Filzmoser, Peter
    Kasper, Siegfried
    WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 12 (03) : 188 - 200
  • [22] Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors
    Johnson, Constance M.
    Wei, Caimiao
    Ensor, Joe E.
    Smolenski, Derek J.
    Amos, Christopher I.
    Levin, Bernard
    Berry, Donald A.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (06) : 1207 - 1222
  • [23] Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors
    Constance M. Johnson
    Caimiao Wei
    Joe E. Ensor
    Derek J. Smolenski
    Christopher I. Amos
    Bernard Levin
    Donald A. Berry
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2013, 24 : 1207 - 1222
  • [24] The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis
    Solmi, M.
    Correll, C. U.
    Carvalho, A. F.
    Ioannidis, J. P. A.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2018, 27 (06) : 537 - 542
  • [25] Meta-analyses of treatment standards for pancreatic cancer
    Gong, Jun
    Tuli, Richard
    Shinde, Arvind
    Hendifar, Andrew E.
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 4 (03) : 315 - 325
  • [26] Assessing small study effects and publication bias in orthodontic meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
    Spyridon N. Papageorgiou
    Moschos A. Papadopoulos
    Athanasios E. Athanasiou
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2014, 18 : 1031 - 1044
  • [27] The Role of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Incidence and Prevalence Studies in Neuroepidemiology
    Fiest, K. M.
    Pringsheim, T.
    Patten, S. B.
    Svenson, L. W.
    Jette, N.
    NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 42 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [28] Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture for Stroke
    Zhang, Jun-huai
    Wang, Deren
    Liu, Ming
    NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 42 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [29] Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Atakpo, Paul
    Vassar, Matt
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 82 (02) : 69 - 74
  • [30] Systematic Analysis of Publication Bias in Neurosurgery Meta-Analyses
    Phua, Qi Sheng
    Lu, Lucy
    Harding, Marguerite
    Fracs, Santosh Isaac Poonnoose
    Jukes, Fracs Alistair
    To, Fracs-Son
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 90 (03) : 262 - 269