Housing Indicators for Sustainable Cities in Middle-Income Countries through the Residential Urban Environment Recognized Using Single-Family Housing Rating Systems

被引:7
作者
Saldana-Marquez, Hector [1 ]
Gamez-Garcia, Diana C. [1 ]
Gomez-Soberon, Jose M. [2 ]
Arredondo-Rea, Susana P. [3 ]
Corral-Higuera, Ramon [3 ]
Gomez-Soberon, Maria C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Barcelona Sch Architecture, 649 Diagonal Ave, Barcelona 08028, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Barcelona Sch Bldg Construct, 44-50 Doctor Maranon Ave, Barcelona 08028, Spain
[3] Autonomous Univ Sinaloa, Mochis Fac Engn, Los Mochis 81210, Mexico
[4] Metropolitan Autonomous Univ, Civil Engn Sch, Av San Pablo 180, Mexico City 02200, DF, Mexico
关键词
housing indicators; residential urban environment; rating systems; single-family house; sustainable cities; residential sector; comparative approach; middle-income countries; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BUILDINGS; DESIGN; IMPACT; LEED; CRITERIA; CARBON;
D O I
10.3390/su11164276
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents a comparative analysis of the housing indicators used by the single-family housing rating systems (SHRSs), in which the residential urban environment (RUE) influences buildings' certification scores, emphasizing the relationships of six systems developed by middle-income countries (MICs)-BEST, CASA, GBI, BERDE, Green Homes, and LOTUS-and the two most-recognized rating systems, BREEAM and LEED. The aim is to provide new housing indicators that are capable of bringing the concept of sustainability into the cities of MICs. The results reveal that the percentage of influence that single-family housing (SFH) can achieve in the metric established by each system is relatively low. However, considering all of the identified indicators, this influence could increase to 53.16% of the total score in multi-criteria evaluations. Furthermore, a significant lack of indicators for mandatory criteria evaluations was found, with CASA being the only system that considers their inclusion. This paper identifies 37 indicators for multi-criteria assessments and two for mandatory-criteria assessments, providing new perspectives on several topics. Furthermore, the methodology established to obtain the indicators could be useful for other researchers in the identification of new sustainable indicators.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Review of sustainability in buildings [J].
Abdellatif, Mawada ;
Al-Shamma'a, Ahmed .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2015, 14 :171-177
[2]   Energy efficiency index as an indicator for measuring building energy performance: A review [J].
Abu Bakar, Nur Najihah ;
Hassan, Mohammad Yusri ;
Abdullah, Hayati ;
Rahman, Hasimah Abdul ;
Abdullah, Md Pauzi ;
Hussin, Faridah ;
Bandi, Masilah .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 44 :1-11
[3]   Allocation and system boundary in life cycle assessments of cities [J].
Alberti, Jaume ;
Roca, Merce ;
Brodhag, Christian ;
Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 83 :41-54
[4]   A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design [J].
Ameen, Raed Fawzi Mohammed ;
Mourshed, Monjur ;
Li, Haijiang .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 55 :110-125
[5]   Initial approximation of the implications for architecture due to climate change [J].
Andric, Ivan ;
Le Corre, Olivier ;
Lacarriere, Bruno ;
Ferrao, Paulo ;
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. .
ADVANCES IN BUILDING ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (03) :337-367
[6]  
[Anonymous], DAT GNI CAP ATL METH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development - Emerging Futures
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU9020186
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P