Discussion of "Capital Injection to Banks versus Debt Relief to Households"
被引:0
|
作者:
Mian, Atif
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USAPrinceton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
Mian, Atif
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CENTRAL BANKING
|
2017年
/
13卷
/
03期
关键词:
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
Jinhyuk Yoo asks an important and interesting question in this paper: if policymakers have to choose between providing debt relief to households versus injecting new capital into banks, how should they evaluate the choice? The paper addresses this question through the lens of a DSGE model, and makes the case that household debt relief is more potent than capital injection for banks as a stimulus measure in the midst of a recession drive by household debt like the one the United States experienced in 2008. Amir Sufi and I also came to a similar conclusion in our 2014 book House of Debt. In my comments below, I will first describe the intuition behind the key result in Yoo's work. I then discuss the empirical relevance of the model's assumption and implications in light of the increasing body of work that has come about since the great recession. Finally, I discuss a conceptual extension of the model that Yoo presents to highlight some important questions for further inquiry.
机构:
Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Australia Japan Res Ctr, Canberra, ACT 0200, AustraliaAustralian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Australia Japan Res Ctr, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Onji, Kazuki
Vera, David
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Calif State Univ Fresno, Dept Econ, Fresno, CA 93740 USAAustralian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Australia Japan Res Ctr, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia