Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?

被引:56
作者
Jack, RH [1 ]
Gulliford, MC
Ferguson, J
Moller, H
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, London, England
[2] Lambeth Southwark & Lewisham Hlth Author, London SE1 7NT, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Thames Canc Registry, London, England
关键词
lung cancer; radiotherapy; chemotherapy; surgery; survival; health services;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6600831
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine whether the management and survival of patients with lung cancer varied among 26 health authorities in South Fast England. The Thames Cancer Registry identified patients diagnosed with lung cancer (ICD-10 codes C33-C34) between 1995 and 1999. After excluding death certificate only patients, 32 8 18 (81%) patients were analysed. The proportions of patients receiving active treatment varied among health authorities between 5 and 17% for non-investigative surgery, 4 and 17% for any chemotherapy, 8 and 30% for any radiotherapy and 15 and 42% for any active treatment. One-year patient survival ranged from 11 to 34%. There was evidence of health authority level variation even after adjusting for case mix. Patients whose first hospital attendance was at a radiotherapy centre were more likely to receive active treatment (OR 1.72, 95% Cl 1.21-2.46), chemotherapy (1.38, 1.06-1.79) or radiotherapy (1.86, 1.28-2.71). There was some evidence that patients whose first hospital attendance was at a radiotherapy centre survived longer. This study shows there is geographical inequality in the treatment given to lung cancer patients and patient survival in South East England. There was some evidence to suggest that these inequalities might be explained by variations in access to oncology services. Future studies should investigate the pathways and barriers to specialist care in this condition.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1031
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Performance league tables: the NHS deserves better [J].
Adab, P ;
Rouse, AM ;
Mohammed, MA ;
Marshall, T .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7329) :95-98
[2]   The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer [J].
Bach, PB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Schrag, D ;
Downey, RJ ;
Gelfand, SE ;
Begg, CB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (03) :181-188
[3]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[4]   Delays in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of lung cancer [J].
Billing, JS ;
Wells, FC .
THORAX, 1996, 51 (09) :903-906
[5]   Age and the treatment of lung cancer [J].
Brown, JS ;
Eraut, D ;
Trask, C ;
Davison, AG .
THORAX, 1996, 51 (06) :564-568
[6]   Rural factors and survival from cancer: analysis of Scottish cancer registrations [J].
Campbell, NC ;
Elliott, AM ;
Sharp, L ;
Ritchie, LD ;
Cassidy, J ;
Little, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 82 (11) :1863-1866
[7]  
Deegan PC, 1998, J ROY COLL PHYS LOND, V32, P339
[8]  
*DEP HLTH, 2001, COMP CLIN HLTH IND 2
[9]  
*DEP HLTH, 1998, OUR HEALTH NAT
[10]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, NHS CANC PLAN PLAN I