Postpartum Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery

被引:8
作者
Wagar, Matthew K. [1 ]
Godecker, Amy [1 ]
Landeros, Maria, V [1 ]
Williams, Makeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
PROPHYLACTIC BILATERAL SALPINGECTOMY; OVARIAN-CANCER; OPPORTUNISTIC SALPINGECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; PERMANENT STERILIZATION; INSURANCE STATUS; TIME; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004285
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare operative outcomes of postpartum salpingectomy and tubal ligation after vaginal delivery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent tubal sterilization between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019, at a large academic hospital, using the electronic medical record. All patients who delivered vaginally and underwent tubal sterilization during their delivery admissions were included. The primary outcome was total operative time. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and readmission within 6 weeks postpartum. Patients who underwent bilateral tubal ligation were compared with those who underwent bilateral salpingectomy using Pearson's chi(2) test, Fisher exact, and Student's t test. RESULTS: A total of 317 eligible patients were identified. One hundred and six (94%) salpingectomies were completed using a bipolar electrocautery device. Operative time was 3 minutes shorter in the salpingectomy group, 30 minutes (interquartile range 24-38) compared with 33.5 (26-42) minutes, P=.032. Patients who underwent salpingectomy were more likely to have estimated blood loss of 5 mL or less (our institutional shorthand for minimal blood loss) than women who underwent bilateral tubal ligation (78 [69%] vs 112 [55%], P=.015). There were no significant differences in perioperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: When using electrocautery, bilateral salpingectomy can be completed in the immediate postpartum period after vaginal delivery with equivalent operative times to bilateral tubal ligation.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 520
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] American Cancer Society, KEY STAT OV CANC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe194, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0000000000003111, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003111]
  • [4] A genetic epidemiological study of carcinoma of the fallopian tube
    Aziz, S
    Kuperstein, G
    Rosen, B
    Cole, D
    Nedelcu, R
    McLaughlin, J
    Narod, SA
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 80 (03) : 341 - 345
  • [5] Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization
    Borrero, Sonya
    Schwarz, Eleanor B.
    Reeves, Matthew F.
    Bost, James E.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Ibrahim, Said A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (01) : 94 - 100
  • [6] Tubal sterilization trends in the United States
    Chan, Lolita M.
    Westhoff, Carolyn L.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [7] Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis
    Cibula, D.
    Widschwendter, M.
    Majek, O.
    Dusek, L.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [8] Role of Fallopian Tubes in the Development of Ovarian Cancer
    Corzo, Camila
    Iniesta, Maria D.
    Guadalupe Patrono, Maria
    Lu, Karen H.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (02) : 230 - 234
  • [9] Female Tubal Sterilization The Time Has Come to Routinely Consider Removal
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Zite, Nikki
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (03) : 596 - 599
  • [10] Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: Theories and realities
    Crum, Christopher P.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2009, 3 (02) : 165 - 170