Budget allocation in coping with supply chain disruption risks

被引:14
作者
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Zhao, Cui [1 ]
Pang, Bo [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Dept Operat & Logist Management, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] BMW Brilliance Automot Ltd, Logist Planning, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
budget allocation; risk response; supply chain disruption (SCD); bow-tie approach; optimization model; MITIGATION; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIES; ANTECEDENTS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2018.1430905
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Disruption management, as an important research topic, has attracted scholars' broad attention in recent years due to the increasing exposure of disruption risks in supply chains. To date, researches in this field often focus on either prevention or mitigation measures and the budget allocation problem is paid relatively little attention. This paper therefore proposes an approach to determine the optimal budget allocation based on prevention measures in combination with mitigation measures. First, considering different disruption situations, the bow-tie is applied to developing the disruption management frameworks that integrate risk prevention and risk mitigation. Second, the corresponding optimization models are formulated to determine the optimal budget allocation plans. In order to validate the proposed approach, we compare the computation results with those obtained from the prevention approach and the mitigation approach. Also, random experiments are conducted to analyse the impacts of randomly generated disruption and response scenarios. Finally, a real-life case is provided to testify the usefulness and merits of our proposed approach. The results show that the proposed approach can help decision-makers reduce more loss caused by the disruption risks.
引用
收藏
页码:4152 / 4167
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Supply chain risk modelling and mitigation
    Aqlan, Faisal
    Lam, Sarah S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (18) : 5640 - 5656
  • [2] A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment
    Aqlan, Faisal
    Lam, Sarah S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 161 : 54 - 63
  • [3] Bakshi N, 2009, PROD OPER MANAG, V18, P583, DOI [10.3401/poms.1080.01031, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01031.x]
  • [4] Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models
    Behzadi, Golnar
    O'Sullivan, Michael Justin
    Olsen, Tava Lennon
    Zhang, Abraham
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 79 : 21 - 42
  • [5] MANAGING FINANCIALLY DISTRESSED SUPPLIERS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
    Bode, Christoph
    Huebner, Denis
    Wagner, Stephan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2014, 50 (04) : 24 - 43
  • [6] UNDERSTANDING RESPONSES TO SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS: INSIGHTS FROM INFORMATION PROCESSING AND RESOURCE DEPENDENCE PERSPECTIVES
    Bode, Christoph
    Wagner, Stephan M.
    Petersen, Kenneth J.
    Ellram, Lisa M.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 54 (04) : 833 - 856
  • [7] Supply chain risk at simultaneous robust perturbations
    Bogataj, D.
    Aver, B.
    Bogataj, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 181 : 68 - 78
  • [8] The impact of supply base complexity on disruptions and performance: the moderating effects of slack and visibility
    Brandon-Jones, Emma
    Squire, Brian
    Van Rossenberg, Yvonne G. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (22) : 6903 - 6918
  • [9] Supply chain risk management and its mitigation in a food industry
    Diabat, Ali
    Govindan, Kannan
    Panicker, Vinay V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (11) : 3039 - 3050
  • [10] Antecedents and dimensions of supply chain robustness: a systematic literature review
    Durach, Christian F.
    Wieland, Andreas
    Machuca, Jose A. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 45 (1-2) : 118 - 137