Changing Default Fluoroscopy Equipment Settings Decreases Entrance Skin Dose in Patients

被引:18
作者
Canales, Benjamin K. [1 ]
Sinclair, Lindsay [3 ]
Kang, Diana [1 ,5 ]
Mench, Anna M. [4 ]
Arreola, Manuel [2 ]
Bird, Vincent G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Urol, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Radiol, Clin Radiol Phys, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Radiol, Salem, OR USA
[4] Salem Hosp, Dept Imaging, Salem, OR USA
[5] Scripps Green Hosp, Dept Urol, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
kidney; nephrolithiasis; radiation dosage; skin; fluoroscopy; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PULSED FLUOROSCOPY; URETEROSCOPY; TIME; NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY; PERSONNEL; FEASIBILITY; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.088
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Proper fluoroscopic education and protocols may reduce the patient radiation dose but few prospective studies in urology have been performed. Using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters we tested whether fluoroscopy time and/or entrance skin dose would decrease after educational and radiation reduction protocols. Materials and Methods: At default manufacturer settings fluoroscopy time and entrance skin dose were prospectively measured using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters in patients undergoing ureteroscopy, retrograde pyelogram/ stent or percutaneous nephrolithotomy with access for stone disease. A validated radiation safety competency test was administered to urology faculty and residents before and after web based, hands-on fluoroscopy training. Default fluoroscopy settings were changed from continuous to intermittent pulse rate and from standard to half-dose output. Fluoroscopy time and entrance skin dose were then measured again. Results: The cohorts of 44 pre-protocol and 50 post-protocol patients with stones were similarly matched. The change in mean fluoroscopy time and entrance skin dose from pre-protocol to post-protocol was -0.6 minutes and -11.6 mGy (33%) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (p = 0.62 and < 0.001), 0.5 minutes and -0.1 mGy (34%) for ureteroscopy (p = 0.42 and 0.31), and 0.1 minute and -0.1 mGy (29%) for retrograde pyelogram/stent (p = 0.85 and 0.49, respectively). Urologist post-training test scores increased 30% from pretraining scores (p = 0.1). Conclusions: Radiation safety training protocols improved clinical knowledge but did not significantly alter fluoroscopy time. Changing equipment default settings to intermittent pulse rate (12 frames per second) and half-dose lowered the entrance skin dose by 30% across all endourology patients but most significantly during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To limit patient radiation exposure fluoroscopy default settings should be decreased before all endourology procedures and image equipment manufacturers should consider lowering standard default renal settings.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 997
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements [J].
Jursinic, Paul A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (12) :4594-4604
[12]   Prospective Measurement of Patient Exposure to Radiation During Pediatric Ureteroscopy [J].
Kokorowski, Paul J. ;
Chow, Jeanne S. ;
Strauss, Keith ;
Pennison, Melanie ;
Routh, Jonathan C. ;
Nelson, Caleb P. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04) :1408-1414
[13]  
Kumar Pratik, 2008, Urol J, V5, P15
[14]   Radiation exposure to the patient and operating room personnel during percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Kumari, Geeta ;
Kumar, Pratik ;
Wadhwa, Pankaj ;
Aron, Monish ;
Gupta, Narmada P. ;
Dogra, Prem N. .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 38 (02) :207-210
[15]   CHARACTERIZATION OF A COMMERCIALLY-AVAILABLE, OPTICALLY-STIMULATED LUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY SYSTEM FOR USE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY [J].
Lavoie, Lindsey ;
Ghita, Monica ;
Brateman, Libby ;
Arreola, Manuel .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2011, 101 (03) :299-310
[16]   Determination of Patient Radiation Dose During Ureteroscopic Treatment of Urolithiasis Using a Validated Model [J].
Lipkin, Michael E. ;
Wang, Agnes J. ;
Toncheva, Greta ;
Ferrandino, Michael N. ;
Yoshizumi, Terry T. ;
Preminger, Glenn M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (03) :920-924
[17]   The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents - Fluoroscopy: Patient radiation exposure issues [J].
Mahesh, M .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2001, 21 (04) :1033-1045
[18]   Factors Affecting Patient Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [J].
Mancini, John G. ;
Raymundo, Eliza M. ;
Lipkin, Michael ;
Zilberman, Dorit ;
Yong, Daniel ;
Banez, Lionel L. ;
Miller, Michael J. ;
Preminger, Glenn M. ;
Ferrandino, Michael N. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (06) :2373-2377
[19]   Tracking Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Utilization Reduces Radiation Exposure During Ureteroscopy [J].
Ngo, Tin C. ;
Macleod, Liam C. ;
Rosenstein, Daniel I. ;
Reese, Jeffrey H. ;
Shinghal, Rajesh .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (05) :763-767
[20]   PREOPERATIVE FACTORS AFFECTING RADIATION TIME DURING PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS [J].
Okhunov, Zhamshid ;
Bird, Vincent ;
Akhavein, Arash ;
Moreira, Daniel ;
George, Arvin ;
Elsamra, Sammy ;
Duty, Brian ;
Del Junco, Michael ;
Asquarova, Fotima ;
Rothberg, Michael ;
Gupta, Mantu ;
Tracy, Chad ;
Newton, Mark ;
Sternberg, Kevan ;
King, Benjamin ;
Shapiro, Edan ;
Moreno, Jorge ;
Pulford, Christopher ;
Carlos Rosales, Juan ;
Srinivasan, Arun ;
Noureldin, Yasser ;
Andonian, Sero ;
Khater, Nazih ;
Baldwin, Duane ;
Ghani, Khurshid ;
Shlykov, Maksim ;
Youssef, Ramy ;
Shinsky, Brian ;
Friedlander, Justin ;
Nakada, Steven ;
Wolf, Stuart, Jr. ;
Smith, Arthur D. ;
Okeke, Zeph ;
Landman, Jaime .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04) :E352-E352