Ecosystem services assessment based on emergy accounting in Chongming Island, Eastern China

被引:64
作者
Zhan, Jinyan [1 ]
Zhang, Fan [1 ]
Chu, Xi [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Yue [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Chinese Agr Policy, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Emergy analysis; Agricultural economy; Impact matrix; Chongming Island; LAND-USE; ECO-ISLAND; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; AGRICULTURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.015
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Chongming Island, the largest alluvial island in the world, is an ecologically sensitive area. Due to its green space, farmland, estuaries and coastal wetlands and its proximity to the city of Shanghai (45 km, home to 24.2 million people), the island supports important agricultural and fisheries economies. This paper carries out an evaluation of the ecosystem services (ES) on Chongming Island, Shanghai, based on the emergy analysis method, identifying the service supply and flow between ecosystems and urban area. Results show that from the ecosystem-type perspective, the tidal wetland ecosystem provides the most service to Chongming Island, accounting for 45.2% ES emergy in 2012, followed by the agricultural ecosystem (34.5%) and the freshwater wetland ecosystem (6.3%). From ecosystem service-type perspective, water supply, flood storage and aquatic product supply are the main emergy outputs of the wetland ecosystem and account for 51.1%, 17.6% and 25.2% of the emergy, respectively. Food supply is the main emergy of the cropland ecosystem output and accounts for 58% of the emergy. Organic matter production and water retention are the main services provided by the forest ecosystem, accounting for 33.6% and 30.0% of the total emergy respectively. Based on the systematic emergy dynamic analysis, on the one hand, the wetland and forest ecosystems played more significant roles in water supply and retention while the cropland ecosystem had a less important role in food supply from 2002 to 2012. On the other hand, the urban ecosystem has gradually transformed from a positive to a passive participant in the role of supplier and user for ecosystem services. Finally, policy options are proposed to promote land use planning and restore/maintain ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 473
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NATURES SERVICES SOC
[3]  
Board M., 2005, MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM, P13
[4]  
Brown M.T., 2001, Handbook of emergy evaluation. A compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of folios, Folio, V3
[5]  
Brown M.T., 2004, Encyclopedia of Energy, P329
[6]   Updated evaluation of exergy and emergy driving the geobiosphere: A review and refinement of the emergy baseline [J].
Brown, Mark T. ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2010, 221 (20) :2501-2508
[7]  
Burkhard B., 2009, Landscape Online
[8]   Valuing ecosystem services from Maryland forests using environmental accounting [J].
Campbell, Elliott T. ;
Tilley, David R. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 7 :141-151
[9]   Environmental accounting of natural capital and ecosystem services for the US National Forest System [J].
Elliott T. Campbell ;
Mark T. Brown .
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2012, 14 (5) :691-724
[10]   Emergy as embodied energy based assessment for local sustainability of a constructed wetland in Beijing [J].
Chen, B. ;
Chen, Z. M. ;
Zhou, Y. ;
Zhou, J. B. ;
Chen, G. Q. .
COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2009, 14 (02) :622-635