Prediction of sudden and non-sudden cardiac death in post-infarction patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction by periodic repolarization dynamics: MADIT-II substudy

被引:64
作者
Rizas, Konstantinos D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McNitt, Scott [4 ]
Hamm, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Massberg, Steffen [1 ,2 ]
Kaeaeb, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Zareba, Wojciech [4 ]
Couderc, Jean-Philippe [4 ]
Bauer, Axel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Med Klin & Poliklin 1, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Biedersteiner Str 29, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Tubingen, Deutsch Herzkompetenz Zentrum, Abt Kardiol, Otfried Muller Str 10, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[4] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Heart Res Follow Up Program, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
Sudden cardiac death; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Risk prediction; Sympathetic nervous system; Electrocardiography; ACTION-POTENTIAL DURATION; HEART-FAILURE; TRANSMURAL DISPERSION; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ARTERIAL-PRESSURE; SPECTRAL-ANALYSIS; RESPIRATORY RATE; TASK-FORCE; RISK; ECG;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehx161
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To test the value of Periodic Repolarization Dynamics (PRD), a recently validated electrocardiographic marker of sympathetic activity, as a novel approach to predict sudden cardiac death (SCD) and non-sudden cardiac death (N-SCD) and to improve identification of patients that profit from ICD-implantation. Methods and results We included 856 post-infarction patients with left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <= 30% of the MADIT-II trial in sinus rhythm. Of these, 507 and 348 patients were randomized to ICD or conventional treatment. PRD was assessed from multipolar 10-min baseline ECGs. Primary and secondary endpoints were total mortality, SCD and N-SCD. Multivariable analyses included treatment group, QRS-duration, New York Heart Association classification, blood-urea nitrogen, diabetes mellitus, beta-blocker therapy and LVEF. During follow-up of 20.4 months, 119 patients died (53 SCD and 36 N-SCD). On multivariable analyses, increased PRD was a significant predictor of mortality (standardized coefficient 1.37[1.19-1.59]; P < 0.001) and SCD (1.40 [1.13-1.75]; P = 0.003) but also predicted N-SCD (1.41[1.10-1.81]; P = 0.006). While increased PRD predicted SCD in conventionally treated patients (1.61[1.23-2.11]; P < 0.001), it was predictive of N-SCD (1.63[1.28-2.09]; P < 0.001) and adequate ICD-therapies (1.20[1.03-1.39]; P = 0.017) in ICD-treated patients. ICD-treatment substantially reduced mortality in the lowest three PRD-quartiles by 53% (P = 0.001). However, there was no effect in the highest PRD-quartile (mortality increase by 29%; P = 0.412; P < 0.001 for difference) as the reduction of SCD was compensated by an increase of N-SCD. Conclusion In post-infarction patients with impaired LVEF, PRD is a significant predictor of SCD and N-SCD. Assessment of PRD is a promising tool to identify post-MI patients with reduced LVEF who might benefit from intensified treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2118
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Transmural dispersion of repolarization and the T wave
    Antzelevitch, C
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2001, 50 (03) : 426 - 431
  • [2] Respiratory rate predicts outcome after acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study
    Barthel, Petra
    Wensel, Roland
    Bauer, Axel
    Mueller, Alexander
    Wolf, Petra
    Ulm, Kurt
    Huster, Katharina M.
    Francis, Darrel P.
    Malik, Marek
    Schmidt, Georg
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (22) : 1644 - 1650
  • [3] 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities
    Epstein, Andrew E.
    DiMarco, John P.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Estes, N. A. Mark, III
    Freedman, Roger A.
    Gettes, Leonard S.
    Gillinov, A. Marc
    Gregoratos, Gabriel
    Hammill, Stephen C.
    Hayes, David L.
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    Newby, L. Kristin
    Page, Richard L.
    Schoenfeld, Mark H.
    Silka, Michael J.
    Stevenson, Lynne Warner
    Sweeney, Michael O.
    Tracy, Cynthia M.
    Epstein, Andrew E.
    Darbar, Dawood
    DiMarco, John P.
    Dunbar, Sandra B.
    Estes, N. A. Mark, III
    Karasik, Pamela E.
    Link, Mark S.
    Marine, Joseph E.
    Schoenfeld, Mark H.
    Shanker, Amit J.
    Silka, Michael J.
    Stevenson, Lynne Warner
    Stevenson, William G.
    Varosy, Paul D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (03) : E6 - E75
  • [4] Oscillatory patterns in sympathetic neural discharge and cardiovascular variables during orthostatic stimulus
    Furlan, R
    Porta, A
    Costa, F
    Tank, J
    Baker, L
    Schiavi, R
    Robertson, D
    Malliani, A
    Mosqueda-Garcia, R
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (08) : 886 - 892
  • [5] Risk stratification for primary implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction
    Goldenberg, Ilan
    Vyas, Anant K.
    Hall, W. Jackson
    Moss, Arthur J.
    Wang, Hongyue
    He, Hua
    Zareba, Wojciech
    McNitt, Scott
    Andrews, Mark L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (03) : 288 - 296
  • [6] Oscillatory behavior of ventricular action potential duration in heart failure patients at respiratory rate and low frequency
    Hanson, Ben
    Child, Nick
    Van Duijvenboden, Stefan
    Orini, Michele
    Chen, Zhong
    Coronel, Ruben
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Gill, Jaspal S.
    Gill, Jaswinder S.
    Taggart, Peter
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [7] Harrell FE, 2015, SPRINGER SER STAT, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7
  • [8] REGRESSION MODELING STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVED PROGNOSTIC PREDICTION
    HARRELL, FE
    LEE, KL
    CALIFF, RM
    PRYOR, DB
    ROSATI, RA
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1984, 3 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [9] Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-4