Impact of adhesive system generation and light curing units on orthodontic bonding: In vitro study

被引:1
作者
Dallel, Ines [1 ]
Lahwar, Sadam [2 ]
Jerbi, Mouhamed Ali [1 ]
Tobji, Samir [1 ]
Ben Amor, Adel [1 ]
Kassab, Asma [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Monastir, Res Lab Oral Hlth & Buccofacial Rehabil LR12ES11, Orthodont Dept, Monastir, Tunisia
[2] Univ Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
[3] Univ Monastir, Dent Med Fac, Res Lab Oral Hlth & Buccofacial Rehabil LR 12ES11, Monastir, Tunisia
关键词
Adhesive system; generation; Bracket bond; Forces; Light curing; SELF-ETCH; STRENGTH; ENAMEL; PRIMER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.020
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective > We aimed to compare adhesive performance of fourth, fifth and seventh generation adhesive systems (GASs) and the effect of two different light curing units on shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and methods > One hundred and twenty extracted human upper premolars were divided in four groups. Bonds were assessed as following: group 1 using 4th GAS, group 2 using 5th GAS, group 3 and 4 using 7th GAS with two different light curing units (1500 and 800mw/cm(2)). Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were counted. Results > Group 1 and 2 showed similar SBSs (P = 0.7) which were significantly higher than group 3 (P = 0.0002). Group 4 exhibited significantly the weakest SBS with mean = 2.15 +/- 0.25. Applying shear forces less than 15 MPa on group 3 bonds led to the release of almost all of the of brackets. Whereas, applying the same forces on group 2 bonds leads to the release of 66.7% of brackets. Notably, only 40% of brackets in group 1 were debonded. Group 4 brackets were totally debonded when applying shear forces less than 10 MPa. While ARI = 0 was the most frequent in group 1, ARI = 3 was the most frequent in group 3. Conclusion > Fourth and fifth GASs showed similar SBS higher than seventh GAS. Fourth GAS bonds were able to resist longer against traction forces than those set up by fifth generation. Seventh GAS bonds offered the least efficient resistance. ARI = 0 was the highest in group 1. However, Group 4 showed the highest ARI = 1 and ARI = 2 revealing cohesive failure. We also found that the adhesive power is proportional to the power of the lamp used. In fact, we concluded that 1500 mw/cm(2) units light curing during 30 seconds generated an ideal energy to enhance orthodontic bracket adhesion.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 805
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Abraham Sathish, 2013, J Int Oral Health, V5, P101
  • [2] Ahmed Tamzid, 2018, Eur J Dent, V12, P602, DOI 10.4103/ejd.ejd_22_18
  • [3] Almeida LF, 2018, J OROFAC ORTHOP, V79, P352, DOI 10.1007/s00056-018-0146-0
  • [4] Davari A R, 2007, J Contemp Dent Pract, V8, P36
  • [5] A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results
    De Munck, J
    Van Landuyt, K
    Peumans, M
    Poitevin, A
    Lambrechts, P
    Braem, M
    Van Meerbeek, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 84 (02) : 118 - 132
  • [6] Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin
    De Munck, J
    Van Meerbeek, B
    Yoshida, Y
    Inoue, S
    Vargas, M
    Suzuki, K
    Lambrechts, P
    Vanherle, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 (02) : 136 - 140
  • [7] de Sena LMF, 2018, BRAZ ORAL RES, V32
  • [8] Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times
    Gupta, Sanjay Prasad
    Shrestha, Basanta Kumar
    [J]. CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 10 : 61 - 67
  • [9] Holzmeier M, 2008, J OROFAC ORTHOP, V69, P78, DOI 10.1007/s00056-008-0709-6
  • [10] Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer
    Hosein, I
    Sherriff, M
    Ireland, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 126 (06) : 717 - 724