Fuzzy logic-based approach for identifying the risk importance of human error

被引:49
作者
Li Peng-cheng [1 ,2 ]
Chen Guo-hua [1 ]
Dai Li-cao [2 ]
Zhang Li [2 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, Inst Safety Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ S China, Human Factor Inst, Hengyang 421001, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Fuzzy logic; Human error; Risk importance assessment; Uncertainty; HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; FAILURES; SYSTEMS; MODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2010.03.012
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the system reliability and safety assessment, the focuses are not only the risks caused by hardware or software, but also the risks caused by "human error". There are uncertainties in the traditional human error risk assessment (e.g. HECA) due to the uncertainties and imprecisions in Human Error Probability (HEP), Error-Effect Probability (EEP) and Error Consequence Severity (ECS). While fuzzy logic can deal with uncertainty and imprecision. It is an efficient tool for solving problems where knowledge uncertainty may occur. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new Fuzzy Human Error Risk Assessment Methodology (FHERAM) for determining Human Error Risk Importance (HERI) as a function of HEP, EEP and ECS. The modeling technique is based on the concept of fuzzy logic, which offers a convenient way of representing the relationships between the inputs (i.e. HEP, EEP, and ECS) and outputs (i.e. HERI) of a risk assessment system in the form of IF THEN rules. It is implemented on fuzzy logic toolbox of MATLAB using Mamdani techniques. A case example is presented to demonstrate the proposed approach. Results show that the method is more realistic than the traditional ones, and it is practicable and valuable. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 913
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis [J].
Konstandinidou, M ;
Nivolianitou, Z ;
Kiranoudis, C ;
Markatos, N .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (06) :706-716
[22]   Analysis of human error and organizational deficiency in events considering risk significance [J].
Lee, YS ;
Kim, Y ;
Kim, SH ;
Kim, C ;
Chung, CH ;
Jung, WD .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2004, 230 (1-3) :61-67
[23]   Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis [J].
Markowski, Adam S. ;
Mannan, M. Sam ;
Bigoszewska, Agata .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (06) :695-702
[24]   Human reliability analysis by fuzzy "CREAM" [J].
Marseguerra, Marzio ;
Zio, Enrico ;
Librizzi, Massimo .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (01) :137-154
[25]  
*MIL STD, 1980, MILSTD1629A US DEP D
[26]   Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements [J].
Mosleh, A ;
Chang, YH .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 83 (02) :241-253
[27]   AN APPROACH TO HUMAN RELIABILITY IN MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS USING ERROR POSSIBILITY [J].
ONISAWA, T .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1988, 27 (02) :87-103
[28]   A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative safety modelling for marine systems [J].
Sii, HS ;
Ruxton, T ;
Wang, J .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 73 (01) :19-34
[29]  
Swain A.D., 1987, NUREGCR4772 USNRC
[30]  
Trager Jr T., 1985, CASE STUDY REPORT LO, V504