Comparison of anthropometry to DXA: a new prediction equation for men

被引:120
作者
Ball, SD
Altena, TS
Swan, PD
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Nutr Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] SW Missouri State Univ, Dept Hlth Phys Educ & Recreat, Springfield, MO USA
[3] Arizona State Univ E, Dept Exercise & Wellness, Mesa, AZ USA
关键词
body composition; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; body fat;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602003
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: This study compared three professionally recommended anthropometric body composition prediction equations for men to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and then developed an updated equation, DXA Criterion ( DC) from DXA. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Exercise Physiology Lab. University of Missouri-Columbia, USA. Subjects: A total of 160 men aged 18-62 y old. Interventions: Percent body fat (%BF) by anthropometry was compared to DXA on the same day. Results: Although %BF was significantly correlated (r=0.923-0.942) (P<0.01) with DXA for all three equations, each equation underestimated %BF (range 3.1-3.3%) (P<0.01) compared to DXA. The following DC equation for men was created: %BF=0.465+0.180(Sigma7SF)-0.0002406(Sigma7SF)(2)+0.06619(age); (Sigma7SF=sum of chest, midaxillary, triceps, subscapular, abdomen, suprailiac, thigh; age years). The predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS)R-2 was high (0.90) and the PRESS standard error of estimates was excellent (2.2% at the mean) for the DC equation when applied to our sample of 160 men. Conclusions: The currently recommended anthropometric equations for men underestimate %BF compared to DXA. The DC equation yields a more accurate estimation of %BF in men aged 18-62 y old. The results from this study support the need for the current %BF standards and norms for men to be adjusted upward.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1531
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, V6th
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J EXERC PHYSL ONLINE
[3]  
BAKKER HK, 1977, HUM BIOL, V49, P187
[4]  
BALL S, IN PRESS RES Q EXERC
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION REVISION OF SOME QUANTIATIVE ASSUMPTIONS [J].
BROZEK, J ;
ANDERSON, JT ;
KEYS, A ;
GRANDE, F .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1963, 110 (01) :113-&
[7]  
Callaway CW, 1988, ANTHROPOMETRIC STAND, P39
[8]  
CLARK RR, 1993, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V25, P528
[9]   Validity of methods of body composition assessment in young and older men and women [J].
Clasey, JL ;
Kanaley, JA ;
Wideman, L ;
Heymsfield, SB ;
Teates, CD ;
Gutgesell, ME ;
Thorner, MO ;
Hartman, ML ;
Weltman, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 86 (05) :1728-1738
[10]   BODY FAT ASSESSED FROM TOTAL-BODY DENSITY AND ITS ESTIMATION FROM SKINFOLD THICKNESS - MEASUREMENTS ON 481 MEN AND WOMEN AGED FROM 16 TO 72 YEARS [J].
DURNIN, JVGA ;
WOMERSLEY, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1974, 32 (01) :77-97