Using online decision trees to support students' self-efficacy in the laboratory

被引:5
作者
McLean, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Meadows, Ken N. [3 ]
Heffernan, Austin [1 ]
Campbell, Nicole [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Ctr Teaching & Learning, London, ON, Canada
关键词
blended learning; inquiry; laboratory; learning resource; self-efficacy; MOTIVATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1152/advan.00016.2019
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Failed experiments are a common occurrence in research, yet many undergraduate science laboratories rely on established protocols to ensure students are able to obtain results. While it is logistically challenging to facilitate students' conducting their own experiments in the laboratory, allowing students to "fail" in a safe environment could help with the development of problem-solving skills. To allow students a safe place to fail and encourage them to think through a laboratory protocol, online decision trees were created to lead students through protocols and give them timely feedback. The online decision trees present students with a scenario, then students execute a protocol by selecting options that will lead them down different paths and result in various realistic results from their experiments. They receive feedback and instructional tutorials throughout the simulation that are dependent on their choices. The significance of this new resource for student learning is that it allows students to practice their problem-solving skills and gain theoretical knowledge about the purpose of various experimental steps. The purpose of this research study was to evaluate whether online decision trees affected students' self-efficacy, metacognition, and motivation for completing a wet laboratory. A mixed-methods approach was used; three surveys were administered throughout the academic term. For survey 1, students completed the decision tree and survey before the wet laboratory. For survey 2, students completed the survey before the wet laboratory but completed the decision tree after the wet laboratory. Students' reported self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation were increased with the administration of the online decision trees before the wet laboratory, but their extrinsic motivation and metacognitive scores were unchanged. For survey 3, students provided written feedback about the impact of the online decision trees, and their responses highlighted the importance of the visual components of the approach.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 435
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
  • [2] Who perceives they are smarter? Exploring the influence of student characteristics on student academic self-concept in physiology
    Cooper, Katelyn M.
    Krieg, Anna
    Brownell, Sara E.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, 42 (02) : 200 - 208
  • [3] Students' motivation toward laboratory work in physiology teaching
    Dohn, Niels Bonderup
    Fago, Angela
    Overgaard, Johannes
    Madsen, Peter Teglberg
    Malte, Hans
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2016, 40 (03) : 313 - 318
  • [4] Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
    Freeman, Scott
    Eddy, Sarah L.
    McDonough, Miles
    Smith, Michelle K.
    Okoroafor, Nnadozie
    Jordt, Hannah
    Wenderoth, Mary Pat
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (23) : 8410 - 8415
  • [5] Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation With Science Majors and Nonscience Majors
    Glynn, Shawn M.
    Brickman, Peggy
    Armstrong, Norris
    Taasoobshirazi, Gita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2011, 48 (10) : 1159 - 1176
  • [6] The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century
    Hofstein, A
    Lunetta, VN
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2004, 88 (01) : 28 - 54
  • [7] Kurbanoglu NI, 2010, AUST J TEACH EDUC, V35, P48
  • [8] College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning
    Lin, YG
    McKeachie, WJ
    Kim, YC
    [J]. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 13 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [9] Enhancing active learning in the student laboratory
    Modell, HI
    Michael, JA
    Adamson, T
    Horwitz, B
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2004, 28 (03) : 107 - 111
  • [10] Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings
    Pajares, F
    [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 66 (04) : 543 - 578