Optimal Environmental Tax Rate in an Open Economy with Labor Migration-An E-DSGE Model Approach

被引:7
作者
Chan, Ying Tung [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Res Inst Econ & Management, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental tax; migration; E-DSGE model; CARBON EMISSIONS; POLICY; GROWTH; TRADE; OIL; AIR; US; POLLUTION; LEAKAGE; PRICES;
D O I
10.3390/su11195147
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent research has started to apply environmental dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (E-DSGE) models for climate policy analysis. However, all of the studies assume a closed economy setting, where there is no interaction of the economy with an outside economy; this paper fills the gap by constructing a two-city E-DSGE model that features labor migration. With the model, we solve for the optimal environmental tax rate determined by a Ramsey social planner, who maximizes household utility and takes into account the policy's impact on labor migration. We find the following. (i) The optimal environmental tax rate should be more volatile and procyclical than the rates predicted in the aforementioned literature. (ii) In the closed economy setting, a higher environmental tax rate would always dampen production, while in our setting, it could stimulate output through deterring labor outflow and attracting labor inflow. (iii) We complement the existing literature by emphasizing that the optimal environmental tax rate in a city should respond not only to the shocks that occur internally, but also to those that occur in the opponent city. In particular, we find that it is optimal to reduce the environmental tax rate if a positive total factor productivity (TFP) shock occurs in the neighbor city.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 38
页数:38
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Energy prices volatility and the United Kingdom: Evidence from a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model
    Aminu, Nasir
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 172 : 487 - 497
  • [2] GHG Emissions Control and Monetary Policy
    Annicchiarico, Barbara
    Di Dio, Fabio
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 67 (04) : 823 - 851
  • [3] Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model
    Annicchiarico, Barbara
    Di Dio, Fabio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 69 : 1 - 21
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, Air Quality Guidelines: Global Update 2005: Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Sulfur Dioxide
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1976, CARNEGIE ROCHESTER C
  • [6] Assessing alternative solutions to carbon leakage
    Antimiani, Alessandro
    Costantini, Valeria
    Martini, Chiara
    Salvatici, Luca
    Tommasino, Maria Cristina
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 299 - 311
  • [7] Input vs. Output Taxation-A DSGE Approach to Modelling Resource Decoupling
    Antosiewicz, Marek
    Lewandowski, Piotr
    Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (04):
  • [8] Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage
    Babiker, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 65 (02) : 421 - 445
  • [9] Oil supply shocks and the US economy: An estimated DSGE model
    Balke, Nathan S.
    Brown, Stephen P. A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 116 : 357 - 372
  • [10] Migration and hedonic valuation: The case of air quality
    Bayer, Patrick
    Keohane, Nathaniel
    Timmins, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 58 (01) : 1 - 14