Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A 5-to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial

被引:13
作者
Chatrattanarak, Wipawan [1 ]
Aunmeungtong, Weerapan [1 ]
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Ctr Excellence Dent Implantol, Fac Dent, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
immediate loaded protocol; implant retained-mandibular overdenture; ISQ; long-term clinical study; marginal bone level change; mini dental implant; patient satisfaction; success rate; survival rate; NARROW-DIAMETER IMPLANTS; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; RETENTION; STABILITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13098
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years. Materials and Methods Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 +/- 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator (R) attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed. Results After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 +/- 1.19 mm, 0.68 +/- 0.90 mm, and 1.55 +/- 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups. Conclude Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 487
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]  
H Huang, 2020, J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, V10, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.004
[22]   Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant [J].
Hasan, Istabrak ;
Heinemann, Friedhelm ;
Aitlahrach, Maria ;
Bourauel, Christoph .
BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2010, 55 (06) :341-350
[23]   Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible [J].
Hermann, JS ;
Buser, D ;
Schenk, RK ;
Cochran, DL .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (09) :1412-1424
[24]   A CONTEMPORARY REVIEW OF THE FACTORS INVOLVED IN COMPLETE DENTURE RETENTION, STABILITY, AND SUPPORT .1. RETENTION [J].
JACOBSON, TE ;
KROL, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 49 (01) :5-15
[25]  
Johns R B, 1992, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V7, P513
[26]   Computerised occlusal analysis of mini-dental implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 1-year prospective clinical study [J].
Kabbua, Phongkamon ;
Aunmeungtong, Weerapan ;
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 47 (06) :757-765
[27]   Is there a certain number of implants needed to retain an overdenture? [J].
Klemetti, E. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 35 :80-84
[28]  
Kodama N, 2016, JDR Clin Trans Res, V1, P20, DOI 10.1177/2380084416630508
[29]   Editor's note: Communication begins when we all speak the same language [J].
Eckert, Steven E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (04) :706-706
[30]   Splinted and unsplinted overdenture attachment systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Leao, R. S. ;
Moraes, S. L. D. ;
Vasconcelos, B. C. E. ;
Lemos, C. A. A. ;
Pellizzer, E. P. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 45 (08) :647-656