Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A 5-to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial

被引:11
作者
Chatrattanarak, Wipawan [1 ]
Aunmeungtong, Weerapan [1 ]
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Ctr Excellence Dent Implantol, Fac Dent, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
immediate loaded protocol; implant retained-mandibular overdenture; ISQ; long-term clinical study; marginal bone level change; mini dental implant; patient satisfaction; success rate; survival rate; NARROW-DIAMETER IMPLANTS; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; RETENTION; STABILITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13098
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years. Materials and Methods Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 +/- 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator (R) attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed. Results After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 +/- 1.19 mm, 0.68 +/- 0.90 mm, and 1.55 +/- 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups. Conclude Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 487
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The effect of 2 versus 4 implants on implant stability in mandibular overdentures: A randomized controlled trial
    Al-Magaleh, Wafa'a R.
    Swelem, Amal A.
    Radi, Iman A. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 118 (06) : 725 - 731
  • [2] Complete overdentures retained by mini implants: A systematic review
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    Verri, Fellippo Ramos
    de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    Mello, Caroline Cantieri
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2017, 57 : 4 - 13
  • [3] CLINICAL, CEPHALOMETRIC, AND DENSITOMETRIC STUDY OF REDUCTION OF RESIDUAL RIDGES
    ATWOOD, DA
    COY, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1971, 26 (03) : 280 - &
  • [4] Aunmeungtong W, 2016, Oral Implantol (Rome), V9, P202, DOI 10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.202
  • [5] Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aunmeungtong, Weerapan
    Kumchai, Thongnard
    Strietzel, Frank P.
    Reichart, Peter A.
    Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02) : 328 - 340
  • [6] MINI IMPLANTS FOR DEFINITIVE PROSTHODONTIC TREATMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Bidra, Avinash S.
    Almas, Khalid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 109 (03) : 156 - 164
  • [7] Branemark PI., 1977, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, V16, P1
  • [8] Bulard Ronald A, 2005, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V26, P892
  • [9] Burns D R, 2000, J Prosthodont, V9, P37, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2000.00037.x
  • [10] Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants .1. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants
    Buser, D
    MericskeStern, R
    Bernard, JP
    Behneke, A
    Behneke, N
    Hirt, HP
    Belser, UC
    Lang, NP
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) : 161 - 172