Does time preference change with age?

被引:36
作者
Bishai, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat & Family Hlth Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
time preference; compensating differentials; aging;
D O I
10.1007/s00148-004-0187-0
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
This Study looks at compensating differentials in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) to derive estimates of the levels of time preference for labor force participants in each of 15 waves of data from 1979 to 1994. With these estimates the evolution of time preference over the life course is described. Future utility among labor force participants appears to be valued more highly by subjects who are older, more schooled, white, or male. Controlling for schooling level, a higher IQ is associated with a preference for more immediate rewards. If social rates of time preference are correlated with individual rates of time preference then population aging could create intergenerational asymmetries in the social rate of time preference. This phenomenon could make the optimal investments of young populations appear selfish to future generations that are older.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 602
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Ainslie G. W., 1992, HYPERBOLIC DISCOUNTI
[2]   DO WAGES RISE WITH JOB SENIORITY [J].
ALTONJI, JG ;
SHAKOTKO, RA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1987, 54 (03) :437-459
[3]  
[Anonymous], EC INQUIRY
[4]   The endogenous determination of time preference [J].
Becker, GS ;
Mulligan, CB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (03) :729-758
[5]  
BEHRMAN JR, 1995, PARENT CHILD
[6]  
Bishai D.M., 2001, EC SUBSTANCE ABUSE, P155
[7]   ON THE ESTIMATION OF STRUCTURAL HEDONIC PRICE MODELS [J].
BROWN, JN ;
ROSEN, HS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (03) :765-768
[8]  
Bryk A.S., 1992, Hierarchical Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
[9]  
Cairns JA, 1997, HEALTH ECON, V6, P341, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199707)6:4<341::AID-HEC277>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Y