Correlation of EGFR expression, gene copy number and clinicopathological status in NSCLC

被引:21
|
作者
Gaber, Rania [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Watermann, Iris [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kugler, Christian [3 ,4 ]
Reinmuth, Nils [3 ,4 ]
Huber, Rudolf M. [5 ,6 ]
Schnabel, Philipp A. [7 ,8 ]
Vollmer, Ekkehard [1 ,4 ]
Reck, Martin [3 ,4 ]
Goldmann, Torsten [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Res Ctr Borstel, D-23845 Borstel, Germany
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Lungenclin Grosshansdorf, Ctr Pulmonol & Thorac Surg, D-22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany
[4] ARCN, Borstel, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[6] CPC M, Munich, Germany
[7] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Inst Pathol, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] TLRC, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR); Immunohistochemistry; Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization; Antibody clones; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; CELL LUNG-CANCER; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; RESPIRATORY SOCIETY CLASSIFICATION; TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION; ERBB RECEPTORS; ADENOCARCINOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s13000-014-0165-0
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Background: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) targeting therapies are currently of great relevance for the treatment of lung cancer. For this reason, in addition to mutational analysis immunohistochemistry (IHC) of EGFR in lung cancer has been discussed for the decision making of according therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to obtain standardization of EGFR-expression methods for the selection of patients who might benefit of EGFR targeting therapies. Methods: As a starting point of a broad investigation, aimed at elucidating the expression of EGFR on different biological levels, four EGFR specific antibodies were analyzed concerning potential differences in expression levels by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and correlated with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and clinicopathological data. 206 tumor tissues were analyzed in a tissue microarray format employing immunohistochemistry with four different antibodies including Dako PharmDx kit (clone 2-18C9), clone 31G7, clone 2.1E1 and clone SP84 using three different scoring methods. Protein expression was compared to FISH utilizing two different probes. Results: EGFR protein expression determined by IHC with Dako PharmDx kit, clone 31G7 and clone 2.1E1 (p <= 0.05) correlated significantly with both FISH probes independently of the three scoring methods; best correlation is shown for 31G7 using the scoring method that defined EGFR positivity when >= 10% of the tumor cells show membranous staining of moderate and severe intensity (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, our data show differences in EGFR expression determined by IHC, due to the applied antibody. Highest concordance with FISH is shown for antibody clone 31G7, evaluated with score B (p = 0.001). On this account, this antibody clone might by utilized for standard evaluation of EGFR expression by IHC.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combined analysis of EGFR and IGF1R gene copy number reveals no mutual correlation, but does show a prognostic implication of high IGF1R copy number in resected NSCLC
    Wynes, Murry W.
    Dziadziuszko, Rafal
    Ranger-Moore, James
    Singh, Shalini
    Peled, Nir
    Szostakiewicz, Barbara
    Dziadziuszko, Katarzyna
    Jassem, Jacek
    Hirsch, Fred R.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5 (06) : S252 - S253
  • [32] EGFR copy number aberrations detected in cfDNA from advanced NSCLC patients
    O'Kane, G. M.
    Li, T.
    Tsao, M.
    Liu, G.
    Pugh, T. J.
    Leighl, N. B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [33] EGFR in malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: Analysis of protein expression, gene copy number, and transcript levels
    Illei, P
    Lopez-Rios, F
    Rusch, V
    Ladanyi, M
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2006, 86 : 309A - 310A
  • [34] INCREASED THYMIDYLATE SYNTHASE (TS) GENE COPY NUMBER IN NSCLC
    Wynes, M. W.
    Dziadziuszko, R.
    Singh, S.
    Christoph, D.
    Ranger-Moore, J.
    Szostakiewicz, B.
    Dziadziuszko, K.
    Eberhardt, W.
    Jassem, J.
    Hirsch, F. R.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5 (05) : S56 - S56
  • [35] EGFR in malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: Analysis of protein expression, gene copy number, and transcript levels
    Illei, PB
    Lopez-Rios, F
    Rusch, V
    Ladanyi, M
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 : 309A - 310A
  • [36] Relationship between EGFR gene copy number variation and EGFR mutations, protein expression, and clinicopathologic parameters in lung adenocarcinoma
    Shin, Hyeong Chan
    Jang, Nu Ri
    Jang, Min Hye
    Kim, Kyung Ju
    Gu, Mi Jin
    Kim, Mi Jin
    Choi, Joon Hyuk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 10 (04): : 4389 - 4399
  • [37] Gefitinib and EGFR Gene Copy Number Aberrations in Esophageal Cancer
    Petty, Russell D.
    Dahle-Smith, Asa
    Stevenson, David A. J.
    Osborne, Aileen
    Massie, Doreen
    Clark, Caroline
    Murray, Graeme I.
    Dutton, Susan J.
    Roberts, Corran
    Chong, Irene Y.
    Mansoor, Wasat
    Thompson, Joyce
    Harrison, Mark
    Chatterjee, Anirban
    Falk, Stephen J.
    Elyan, Sean
    Garcia-Alonso, Angel
    Fyfe, David Walter
    Wadsley, Jonathan
    Chau, Ian
    Ferry, David R.
    Miedzybrodzka, Zosia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (20) : 2279 - +
  • [38] Gene copy number may be associated with response to EGFR inhibitors
    Zielinski, SL
    Travis, K
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (10) : 712 - 712
  • [39] The relationship between gene copy number and gene expression
    Matthews, Sophie
    Seoighe, Cathal
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 593 - 593
  • [40] Correlation of EGFR copy number changes in different patterns of amplification in glioblastoma
    Navarro, Lara
    Munoz-Hidalgo, Lisandra
    Gil-Benso, Rosario
    Gregori-Romero, Mariela
    Quilis, Vicent
    Pellin, Antonio
    Gonzalez-Darder, Jose
    Lopez-Gines, Concha
    Cerda-Nicolas, Miguel
    CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2012, 35 : S20 - S20