da Vinci and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Analysis of Insurance Costs

被引:23
作者
Niklas, Christina [1 ]
Saar, Matthias [1 ]
Berg, Britta [1 ]
Steiner, Katrin [1 ]
Janssen, Martin [1 ]
Siemer, Stefan [1 ]
Stoeckle, Michael [1 ]
Ohlmann, Carsten-Henning [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Dept Urol & Pediat Urol, Med Ctr, Homburg, Germany
关键词
da Vinci; Robotic; Prostatectomy; Costs; DRG; Reimbursement; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; COMPLICATIONS; RATES; MEN; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1159/000431104
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and reimbursement costs of open and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies in Germany. Methods: Perioperative data of 499 open (20032006) and 932 (2008-2010) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies as well as longitudinal reimbursement costs of an anonymized health insurance research database from Germany containing data of patients who underwent robotic -assisted or open radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analysed in a single-centre study. Results: Significantly better outcomes after robotic-assisted vs. open prostatectomy were observed in regards to positive surgical margins (13.3 vs. 22.4%; p < 0.0001), intraoperative transfusions (0.1 vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0001), hospitalization (8.7 vs. 15.2 days; p < 0.0001) and duration of catheter (6.6 vs. 12.8 days; p < 0.0001). Operating time was significantly longer with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy when compared to open surgery (184.4 vs. 128.0 min; p < 0.0001), while intraoperative complications showed a similar occurrence between both groups. Significant fewer postoperative complications were observed after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (26.5 vs. 42.5%; p < 0.0001) and rate of re-admission was lower for the robotic patients (13.6 vs. 19.4%; p = 0.0050). While insurance costs were higher in the 2 years before radical prostatectomy for the patients who underwent a robotic procedure (4,241.60 vs. 3,410.23 (sic); p = 0.202), additive costs of care of the year of surgery plus the 2 following years were less for the robotic cohort when compared to the costs incurred by the open group (21,673.71 vs. 24,512.37 (sic); p = 0.1676). Conclusions: The observed clinical advantages of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy seem to result in reduced health insurance cost postoperatively when compared to open surgery. This should be taken into consideration regarding reimbursement and implementation of a clinically superior method. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 294
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, INT LEITL QUAL S3 FR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, SCHW AK STAT VERS PR
  • [3] Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring - Review of early clinical results
    Ballantyne, GH
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (10): : 1389 - 1402
  • [4] Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after more than 5 years
    Billia, Michele
    Elhage, Oussama
    Challacombe, Benjamin
    Cahill, Declan
    Popert, Rick
    Holmes, Kathy
    Kirby, Roger Sinclair
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (02) : 413 - 418
  • [5] Costs of Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Bolenz, Christian
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Lotan, Yair
    Lowrance, William T.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) : 316 - 324
  • [6] Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Robot-assisted and Standard Laparoscopic Prostatectomy as Alternatives to Open Radical Prostatectomy for Treatment of Men with Localised Prostate Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment from the Perspective of the UK National Health Service
    Close, Andrew
    Robertson, Clare
    Rushton, Stephen
    Shirley, Mark
    Vale, Luke
    Ramsay, Craig
    Pickard, Robert
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (03) : 361 - 369
  • [7] Primary treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer: a comprehensive lifetime cost-utility analysis
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Ramakrishna, Naren R.
    Duff, Steven B.
    Hughes, Kathleen E.
    Sadownik, Sara
    Smith, Joseph A.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (03) : 437 - 450
  • [8] Learning Curve Assessment of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared with Open-Surgery Controls from the Premier Perspective Database
    Davis, John W.
    Kreaden, Usha S.
    Gabbert, Jessica
    Thomas, Raju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (05) : 560 - 566
  • [9] Prospective comparison of the impact of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy on health-related quality of life and decision regret
    Davison, B. Joyce
    Matthew, Andrew
    Gardner, Abbie M.
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (1-2): : E68 - E72
  • [10] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213