Comparative Study between Dermo, Pelite, and Seal-In X5 Liners: Effect on Patient's Satisfaction and Perceived Problems

被引:6
作者
Ali, Sadeeq [1 ]
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan [1 ]
Arifin, Nooranida [1 ]
Gholizadeh, Hossein [1 ]
Abd Razak, Nasrul Anwar [1 ]
Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
TRANS-TIBIAL AMPUTEES; PATELLAR-TENDON-BEARING; INTERFACE PRESSURE; PROSTHETIC SOCKET; TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES; GEL LINER; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESIDUAL LIMB; ICEROSS; BIOMECHANICS;
D O I
10.1155/2014/769810
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose. This study aimed to compare the effect of satisfaction and perceived problems between Pelite, Dermo with shuttle lock, and Seal-In X5 liners on the transtibial amputees. Material and Methods. A total of thirty transtibial amputees (17 male, 13 female) volunteered to take part in this research. Two prostheses were fabricated for each participant. Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was filled in by the participants with the three liners. Results. The statistics highlight that Dermo liner showed significantly higher score (P = 0.05) in walking, walking on uneven surfaces, stairs walking, fitting, donning/doffing, sitting, suspension, and overall satisfaction with Dermo liner compared with Seal-In X5 and Pelite liners. Overall satisfaction was 34% higher with Dermo liner than Seal-In X5 liner and 28% higher than Pelite liner. Participants reported less problems with Dermo liner and significant differences (P < 0.05) were recorded between the three liners in sweating, skin irritation, frustration, and pain compared with Seal-In X5 and Pelite liners. Conclusion. Participants experienced high level of satisfaction and practiced fewer problems with Dermo liner. These results showed that there is good indication to believe that Dermo liner might be a good choice for transtibial users and might help the clinicians and prosthetic practitioners in selection criteria of prosthetic liners.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction [J].
Ali, Sadeeq ;
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan ;
Eshraghi, Arezoo ;
Gholizadeh, Hossein ;
bin Abd Razak, Nasrul Anwar ;
Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Bin Wan .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2013, 28 (9-10) :994-999
[2]   Qualitative Study of Prosthetic Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees' Satisfaction and Perceived Problems With Their Prosthetic Devices [J].
Ali, Sadeeq ;
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan ;
Naqshbandi, Mohammad Muzamil ;
Eshraghi, Arezoo ;
Kamyab, Mojtaba ;
Gholizadeh, Hossein .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (11) :1919-1923
[3]   Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction [J].
Ali, Sadeeq ;
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan ;
Mortaza, Niyousha ;
Eshraghi, Arezoo ;
Gholizadeh, Hossein ;
Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Bin Wan .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 27 (09) :943-948
[4]  
Åström I, 2004, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V28, P28
[5]   Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses [J].
Baars, ECT ;
Geertzen, JHB .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 29 (01) :27-37
[6]   Comparison of satisfaction with current prosthetic care in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts with major traumatic limb loss [J].
Berke, Gary M. ;
Fergason, John ;
Milani, John R. ;
Hattingh, John ;
McDowell, Martin ;
Nguyen, Viet ;
Reiber, Gayle E. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 47 (04) :361-371
[7]  
Bertels T, 2011, P MYOEL S
[8]  
Boonstra A., 1996, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, V8, P96
[9]   Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket [J].
Boutwell, Erin ;
Stine, Rebecca ;
Hansen, Andrew ;
Tucker, Kerice ;
Gard, Steven .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 49 (02) :227-240
[10]  
CLUITMANS J, 1994, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V18, P78