Compensation committees, CEO pay and firm performance

被引:14
作者
Kanapathippillai, Sutharson [1 ]
Gul, Ferdinand [1 ]
Mihret, Dessalegn [2 ]
Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, 221 Bwwood Highway, Bwwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, 445 Swanston St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
Chief executive officer; Compensation committee; Compensation; Global financial crisis; Agency theory; Prospect theory; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; REMUNERATION COMMITTEES; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; BOARD CHARACTERISTICS; CASH COMPENSATION; PROSPECT-THEORY; PANEL-DATA; GOVERNANCE; QUALITY; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101187
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine whether compensation committee existence (CCX) and compensation committee effectiveness (CCE) are associated with CEO pay-performance alignment, using data drawn from a sample of Australian listed companies. We find that compensation committee existence and effectiveness are positively associated with CEO pay-performance alignment. Further, our results show that the relationships hold for the pre- and post-GFC (Global Financial Crisis) periods but not for the crisis period. This evidence supports the prospect theory argument that in times of macroeconomic crisis, uncontrollable factors external to the firm constitute a firm's reference point for making executive remuneration decisions. These results are robust to alternative measures of firm performance and CEO cash compensation as well as tests of endogeneity. Overall, our evidence suggests that compensation committees contribute to addressing agency problems pertinent to contemporary corporate governance practices.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   The Influence of CEO Power on Compensation Contract Design [J].
Abernethy, Margaret A. ;
Kuang, Yu Flora ;
Qin, Bo .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 90 (04) :1265-1306
[2]  
Adams S., 2014, Forbes
[3]   The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Jackson, G .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (03) :447-465
[4]   Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Mansi, SA ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2004, 37 (03) :315-342
[5]   An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Bizjak, JM .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2003, 27 (07) :1323-1348
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Corporate governance principles and recommendations with 2010 amendments, V2nd
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CORP GOV PRINC REC, Vfirst
[8]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[9]  
Australian productivity commission, 2010, EX REM AUSTR
[10]   Accounting quality and debt contracting [J].
Bharath, Sreedhar T. ;
Sunder, Jayanthi ;
Sunder, Shyam V. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 83 (01) :1-28