Electronic patient-reported outcomes and toxicities during radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer

被引:21
作者
Niska, Joshua R. [1 ]
Halyard, Michele Y. [1 ]
Tan, Angelina D. [2 ]
Atherton, Pamela J. [2 ]
Patel, Samir H. [1 ]
Sloan, Jeff A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Adverse events; Head-and-neck cancer; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Radiation; Toxicity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; STAGE NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL PREDICTOR; ONCOLOGY PRACTICE; SCALE; CHEMOTHERAPY; DEPRESSION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-017-1528-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To characterize quality of life (QOL) using real-time, electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) and to evaluate adverse events (AEs) and supportive care during head-and-neck radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Sixty-five patients undergoing head-and-neck RT completed electronic, real-time, 12-item linear analog self-assessments (LASA) at baseline, before biweekly appointments, and at the last week of RT. Changes in QOL domains between time points were calculated. Clinical data were collected from the institutional medical record. AEs were recorded at the same time points as the LASA and graded. During head-and-neck RT, most patients had clinically meaningful decreases in all QOL domains except level of support, financial concerns, and legal concerns. QOL domains with the most prevalent, clinically meaningful decreases were fatigue (75.4% of patients; 95% CI, 62.9-84.9%), social activity (70.8%; 95% CI, 58.0-81.1%), and overall QOL (70.8%; 95% CI, 58.0-81.1%). All patients had grade 2 AEs; 35.4% had grade 3 (50.0%, CCRT; 12.0%, RT; P = .002). Weight loss averaged 5.5 kg (6.9 kg, CCRT; 2.8 kg, RT; P < .001). Intravenous hydration was needed in 52.3% (77.5%, CCRT; 12.0%, RT; P < .001); feeding tube placement 40.0% (57.5%, CCRT; 12.0%, RT; P = .001); emergency department visits without hospitalization, 10.8%; and emergent hospitalization, 27.7% (37.5%, CCRT; 12.0%, RT; P = .04). Head-and-neck RT, particularly CCRT, negatively impacts patients' overall QOL, social activity, and fatigue, with frequent grade 3 AEs, weight loss, intravenous hydration, feeding tube placement, ED visits, and hospitalization. Real-time ePROs allow providers to monitor QOL at multiple time points during RT, potentially allowing early intervention to improve QOL and mitigate AEs.
引用
收藏
页码:1721 / 1731
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Quality of life and survival outcome for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy - A longitudinal study
    Fang, Fu-Min
    Chien, Chih-Yen
    Tsai, Wen-Ling
    Chen, Hui-Chun
    Hsu, Hsuan-Chih
    Lui, Chun-Chung
    Huang, Tai-Lin
    Huang, Hsuan-Ying
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (02): : 356 - 364
  • [12] On tests for multivariate normality and associated simulation studies
    Farrell, Patrick J.
    Salibian-Barrera, Matias
    Naczk, Katarzyna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2007, 77 (11-12) : 1053 - 1068
  • [13] How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30
    Fromme, EK
    Eilers, KM
    Mori, M
    Hsieh, YC
    Beer, TM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (17) : 3485 - 3490
  • [14] General health measures and long-term survival in patients with head and neck cancer
    Grignon, Laurent M.
    Jameson, Mark J.
    Karnell, Lucy Hynds
    Christensen, Alan J.
    Funk, Gerry F.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2007, 133 (05) : 471 - 476
  • [15] Comparison of conditional quality of life terminology and visual analogue scale measurements
    Grunberg, SM
    Groshen, S
    Steingass, S
    Zaretsky, S
    Meyerowitz, B
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [16] Health state valuations from the general public using the Visual Analogue Scale
    Gudex, C
    Dolan, P
    Kind, P
    Williams, A
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (06) : 521 - 531
  • [17] Assessing the clinical significance of real-time quality of life (QUE.) data hi cancer patients treated with radiation therapy.
    Halyard, M. Y.
    Tan, A.
    Callister, M. D.
    Ashman, J. B.
    Vora, S. A.
    Wong, W.
    Schild, S. E.
    Atherton, P. J.
    Sloan, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [18] Physician Perspective on Incorporation of Oncology Patient Quality-of-Life, Fatigue, and Pain Assessment Into Clinical Practice
    Hubbard, Joleen M.
    Grothey, Axel F.
    McWilliams, Robert R.
    Buckner, Jan C.
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2014, 10 (04) : 248 - 253
  • [19] Development of a new type of global quality of life scale, and comparison of performance and preference for 12 global scales
    Hyland, ME
    Sodergren, SC
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (05) : 469 - 480
  • [20] Prospective Randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
    Kam, Michael K. M.
    Leung, Sing-Fai
    Zee, Benny
    Chau, Ricky M. C.
    Suen, Joyce J. S.
    Mo, Frankie
    Lai, Maria
    Ho, Rosalie
    Cheung, Kin-yin
    Yu, Brian K. H.
    Chiu, Samuel K. W.
    Choi, Peter H. K.
    Teo, Peter M. L.
    Kwan, Wing-hong
    Chan, Anthony T. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (31) : 4873 - 4879