Spinal circuits can accommodate interaction torques during multijoint limb movements

被引:23
作者
Buhrmann, Thomas [1 ]
Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, IAS Res Ctr Life Mind & Soc, Dept Log & Philosophy Sci, San Sebastian, Spain
[2] Basque Fdn Sci, Ikerbasque, Bilbao, Spain
[3] Univ Sussex, Ctr Computat Neurosci & Robot, Brighton, E Sussex, England
关键词
motor control; interaction torques; intersegmental dynamics; spinal circuits; internal model; intralimb coordination; equilibrium-point hypothesis; ARM MOVEMENTS; ANTAGONIST MUSCLES; NERVOUS-SYSTEM; MOTOR CONTROL; FORCE; ELBOW; COORDINATION; DYNAMICS; MODEL; WRIST;
D O I
10.3389/fncom.2014.00144
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The dynamic interaction of limb segments during movements that involve multiple joints creates torques in one joint due to motion about another. Evidence shows that such interaction torques are taken into account during the planning or control of movement in humans. Two alternative hypotheses could explain the compensation of these dynamic torques. One involves the use of internal models to centrally compute predicted interaction torques and their explicit compensation through anticipatory adjustment of descending motor commands. The alternative, based on the equilibrium-point hypothesis, claims that descending signals can be simple and related to the desired movement kinematics only, while spinal feedback mechanisms are responsible for the appropriate creation and coordination of dynamic muscle forces. Partial supporting evidence exists in each case. However, until now no model has explicitly shown, in the case of the second hypothesis, whether peripheral feedback is really sufficient on its own for coordinating the motion of several joints while at the same time accommodating intersegmental interaction torques. Here we propose a minimal computational model to examine this question. Using a biomechanics simulation of a two-joint arm controlled by spinal neural circuitry, we show for the first time that it is indeed possible for the neuromusculoskeletal system to transform simple descending control signals into muscle activation patterns that accommodate interaction forces depending on their direction and magnitude. This is achieved without the aid of any central predictive signal. Even though the model makes various simplifications and abstractions compared to the complexities involved in the control of human arm movements, the finding lends plausibility to the hypothesis that some multijoint movements can in principle be controlled even in the absence of internal models of intersegmental dynamics or learned compensatory motor signals.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   ORGANIZING PRINCIPLES FOR VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT - EXTENDING SINGLE-JOINT RULES [J].
ALMEIDA, GL ;
HONG, DA ;
CORCOS, D ;
GOTTLIEB, GL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 74 (04) :1374-1381
[2]  
ATKESON CG, 1985, J NEUROSCI, V5, P2318
[3]  
Balasubramaniam R, 2004, UND COM SYS, P155
[4]   Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics [J].
Beer, RF ;
Dewald, JPA ;
Rymer, WZ .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 131 (03) :305-319
[5]   Cortical networks for control of voluntary arm movements under variable force conditions [J].
Bullock, D ;
Cisek, P ;
Grossberg, S .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1998, 8 (01) :48-62
[6]   ADAPTIVE NEURAL NETWORKS FOR CONTROL OF MOVEMENT TRAJECTORIES INVARIANT UNDER SPEED AND FORCE RESCALING [J].
BULLOCK, D ;
GROSSBERG, S .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 10 (01) :3-53
[7]   SELECTIVE STABILIZATION OF DEVELOPING SYNAPSES AS A MECHANISM FOR SPECIFICATION OF NEURONAL NETWORKS [J].
CHANGEUX, JP ;
DANCHIN, A .
NATURE, 1976, 264 (5588) :705-712
[8]   The maximum shortening velocity of muscle should be scaled with activation [J].
Chow, JW ;
Darling, WG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 86 (03) :1025-1031
[9]  
COOKE JD, 1995, EXP BRAIN RES, V106, P169
[10]   SAMPLING OF TOTAL MUSCLE FORCE BY TENDON ORGANS [J].
CRAGO, PE ;
HOUK, JC ;
RYMER, WZ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 47 (06) :1069-1083