Lessons learnt from errors in radiotherapy centers

被引:0
作者
Asnaashari, K. [1 ]
Gholami, S. [2 ]
Khosravi, H. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Allied Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Nucl Regulatory Author, Nucl & Radiat Support Dept, Tehran, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH | 2014年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
Quality control; radiotherapy errors; clinical audit; lack of technology; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER-TREATMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; ONCOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this work is to discover and analyze errors and incidents in some radiotherapy centers, and to introduce methods that could reduce their occurrences, especially those which had happened due to the use of improper and inadequate equipment. This work is a first step toward clarifying the role of education in a risk-conscious culture, and changing the attitude of radiotherapy staff when they are working under encouraging conditions that remove barriers for reporting errors. Materials and Methods: For the present study clinical investigation, the data of 6000 patients were checked. They were treated at a few radiotherapy centers during one year. Patients were treated by linear accelerator or cobalt machine, photon or electron beams. A purposely designed check list was used for error data collection. Incidents were discovered by manual check at different steps of treatment. By highlighting frequency of occurrence, further investigation for preventing error repetition can be possible. Eighty five incidents were reported by Technologists, fifty four were reported by Physicists, and twenty six events were pointed out by Radiation Oncologists. Results: About fifty percent of total 165 detected events were classified as treatment field errors. Geometrical misses in treatment field have the highest probability for both photon and electron beams. Conclusion: Incident prevention considering likelihood of individual event can be possible when using facilities like record-and-verification (R&V) system and electronic-portal-image-device (EPID), taking seriously QA, defining and implementing layers of defense in depth, and making an organized system for reporting and analyzing errors.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 367
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Radiotherapy Risk Profile
[2]  
Baiotto B, 2009, TUMORI, V95, P467
[3]   The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment - Estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines [J].
Delaney, G ;
Jacob, S ;
Featherstone, C ;
Barton, M .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (06) :1129-1137
[4]   American Association of Physicists in Medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Fraass, B ;
Doppke, K ;
Hunt, M ;
Kutcher, G ;
Starkschall, G ;
Stern, R ;
Van Dyke, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1773-1829
[5]   Feasibility study of using statistical process control to optimize quality assurance in radiotherapy [J].
Gerard, Karine ;
Grandhaye, Jean-Pierre ;
Marchesi, Vincent ;
Aletti, Pierre ;
Husson, Francois ;
Noel, Alain ;
Kafrouni, Hanna .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2009, 15 (04) :331-+
[6]   The systematic error detection as a classification problem [J].
Gluhchev, G ;
Shalev, S .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 1996, 17 (12) :1233-1238
[7]  
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2000, IAEA SAF REP SER
[8]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements - ICRU, 1976, 24 ICRU
[9]   Quality Assurance of Radiotherapy in Cancer Treatment: Toward Improvement of Patient Safety and Quality of Care [J].
Ishikura, Satoshi .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 38 (11) :723-729
[10]   The Clinical Oncology Information Network (COIN) Project: background, purpose and products [J].
Karp, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1999, 5 (02) :179-187