Comparison of efficacy of silver-nanoparticle gel, nano-silver-foam and collagen dressings in treatment of partial thickness burn wounds

被引:22
|
作者
Erring, Miying [1 ]
Gaba, Sunil [1 ]
Mohsina, Subair [1 ]
Tripathy, Satyaswarup [1 ]
Sharma, Ramesh Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] PGIMER, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Re-epithelialisation; Healing; Second-degree burns; Silver dressing; Cost-effectiveness; Scar quality; NANOCRYSTALLINE SILVER; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ACTICOAT(TM); MANAGEMENT; SULFADIAZINE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.019
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of silver nanoparticle gel (SG), nanosilver foam (SF) and collagen (C) dressings in partial thickness burn wounds. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study carried out over a period of 1 year on patients with 15-40% partial thickness thermal burns <48h. Each patient received all three dressings (silver-nanoparticle gel, nanosilver foam, collagen) simultaneously at 3 randomly selected areas which were comparable in terms of burn depth and surface area. Efficacy of the dressings was assessed in terms of healing rates, time taken and ease of application, pain at dressing change, cost, wound-swab culture and scar quality (at 3 months). Results: A total of 20 patients were included. In SF group, number of patients with 60%-80% re-epithelialization on day10 (SG: 10/20; C: 10/20; SF: 16/20; p = 0.042) and complete healing on day14 (SF: 11/20, C: 6/20, SG: 4/20; p = 0.032) was significantly higher. The time for dressing change was similar at admission (p = 0.918) and day 10 (p = 0.163), although majority of the patients in SF group needed less than 10 min. The time taken (<10 min) was significantly lower in SF group by 14th day (SF: 18/20 C: 6/20 SG: 6/20; p < 0.001). The ease of application rated by clinicians as "extremely easy" was significantly better in SF group (SG: 78%, C: 80%, SF: 95%; p = 0.011). There was a significantly faster decrease in pain scores in SF group by 5th day (VAS score SF: 6, C: 8; SG: 8; p = 0.038), however, pain scores were comparable at 2 weeks. The scar quality (p = 0.82), cost (p = 0.09) and infection rates (SG: 7/20; C: 4/20; SF: 3/20; p = 0.05) were comparable. The need for skin-graft cover was lower in SF group (SG: 5/20; C: 3/20; SF: 1/20). Conclusion: Nanosilver-foam dressings were found to be more efficacious for re-epithelialization, healing, ease of application, tolerance when compared to silver nanoparticle gel and collagen dressings in partial-thickness burns. All were found to be safe. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1888 / 1894
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Silver-Coated Foam Dressings in Open Wound Treatment in Dogs: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
    Nolff, Mirja C.
    Albert, Rebecca
    Reese, Sven
    Meyer-Lindenberg, Andrea
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2018, 31 (04) : 229 - 238
  • [22] Silver-Collagen Dressing and High-voltage, Pulsed-current Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Full-thickness Wounds: A Case Series
    Zhou, Kehua
    Krug, Kenneth
    Stachura, John
    Niewczyk, Paulette
    Ross, Michael
    Tutuska, Justine
    Ford, Gregory
    OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 62 (03) : 36 - 44
  • [23] Comparison of silver-coated dressing (Acticoat®), chlorhexidine acetate 0.5% (Bactigrass®) and nystatin for topical antifungal effect in Candida albicans-contaminated, full-skin-thickness rat burn wounds
    Acar, Ali
    Uygur, Fatih
    Diktas, Husrev
    Evinc, Rahrni
    Ulkur, Ersin
    Oncul, Oral
    Gorenek, Levent
    BURNS, 2011, 37 (05) : 882 - 885
  • [24] Effectiveness of collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose/silver-containing composite wound dressing for the treatment of medium-depth split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds in multi-morbid patients: a prospective, non-comparative, single-centre study
    Konstantinow, Alexander
    Fischer, Tatjana V.
    Ring, Johannes
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (05) : 791 - 800