The effects of response sharing and stimulus presentation frequency on event-related potentials in an auditory oddball paradigm

被引:1
作者
Horvath, Janos [1 ]
Roeber, Urte [2 ]
Schroeger, Erich [2 ]
机构
[1] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, H-1394 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Psychol 1, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Attention; Conflict; Oddball paradigm; Categorization; Event related potentials (ERP); N2; P3a; P3b; INVOLUNTARY ATTENTION; MENTAL CHRONOMETRY; N2; COMPONENT; PERCEPTION; ERP; CONFLICT; BRAIN; P300; CATEGORIZATION; NOVELTY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00990.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An experimental model for investigating the processes involved in reacting to unpredictable events is the oddball paradigm. We investigated how the commonality or independence of response options (i.e., many-to-one vs. one-to-one stimulus-response mappings) influences processing in an auditory oddball paradigm. Participants performed a discrimination task with two one-to-one and one two-to-one mappings. The pattern of conflict- and oddball-related N2 event-related potentials suggest that information that would allow correct responding is represented at the latency of the N2. Integration of this information takes place only by the latency of P3b, and longer reaction times to rare stimuli are probably due to processes preventing the utilization of this information. We also suggest that, in the given task context, conflict-related N2 may reflect the number of alternative stimuli leading to alternative response options.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 941
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex [J].
Azizian, A ;
Freitas, AL ;
Parvaz, MA ;
Squires, NK .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 (03) :253-260
[2]   CHOICE REACTION TIME AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS VERSUS RESPONSE RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE [J].
BERTELSON, P ;
TISSEYRE, F .
NATURE, 1966, 212 (5066) :1069-+
[3]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[4]   THE N2 COMPONENT ELICITED BY STIMULUS MATCHES AND MULTIPLE TARGETS [J].
BRETON, F ;
RITTER, W ;
SIMSON, R ;
VAUGHAN, HG .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 27 (01) :23-44
[5]   ERP correlates of phoneme perception in speech and sound contexts [J].
Celsis, P ;
Doyon, B ;
Boulanouar, K ;
Pastor, J ;
Démonet, JF ;
Nespoulous, JL .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (07) :1523-1527
[6]   Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli [J].
Czigler, Istvan ;
Cox, Trevor J. ;
Gyimesi, Kinga ;
Horvath, Janos .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2007, 420 (03) :251-256
[7]   Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300 [J].
Dien, J ;
Spencer, KM ;
Donchin, E .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 41 (05) :665-678
[8]   IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374
[9]   The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition [J].
Donkers, FCL ;
van Boxtel, GJM .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2004, 56 (02) :165-176
[10]   Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials [J].
Escera, C ;
Alho, K ;
Schröger, E ;
Winkler, I .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2000, 5 (3-4) :151-166