Global Versus Non-Global Banks: A Capital Ratios-Based Analysis

被引:3
作者
Drakos, Konstantinos [1 ]
Malandrakis, Ioannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Athens, Greece
关键词
CAMELS factors; financial crisis; Global banks; Leverage Ratio; Non-global banks; Total Capital Ratio; CRISIS; DETERMINANTS; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.2478/jcbtp-2021-0011
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the Leverage Ratio and Total Capital Ratio of global versus non-global banks in both the pre- and postcrisis periods. A panel data set of 165 global and non-global financial institutions from 38 countries is used for the period 1999-2015 and a random effects model is employed to examine whether global banks perform better or not compared to their non-global counterparts. This study comes up with two important findings. First, global banks do not exhibit heterogeneous behaviour with respect to both ratios neither in the pre- and especially nor in the post-crisis period. Second, the Leverage Ratio is crisis-insensitive, but the Total Capital Ratio is not. Our findings encourage further research on the topic of the contribution of global banks to the financial crisis propagation (at least as far as leverage is concerned).
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 22
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EBA report
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 2016 List of Global Systemically Important Insurers
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 1394 EUR CENTR BANK
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
[5]  
Baltagi HB, 2005, ECONOMETRIC ANAL PAN
[6]   The systemic importance of banks - name and shame seems to work [J].
Banbula, Piotr ;
Iwanicz-Drozdowska, Malgorzata .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 18 :297-301
[7]  
Bank for International Settlements (BIS), 2009, 79 ANN REPORT BIS
[8]  
Banks around the World, 2016, TOP BANKS WORLD
[9]  
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 2017, GLOBAL SYSTEMICALLY
[10]  
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 2019, LEV RAT REQ GLOB SYS