Common Metrics to Benchmark Human-Machine Teams (HMT): A Review

被引:49
作者
Damacharla, Praveen [1 ]
Javaid, Ahmad Y. [1 ]
Gallimore, Jennie J. [2 ]
Devabhaktuni, Vijay K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Bowling Green State Univ, Coll Technol Architecture & Appl Engn, Bowling Green, OH 43402 USA
关键词
Autonomous system; benchmarking; human factors; human-machine teaming (HMT); metrics; performance metrics; robotics; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; SITUATION AWARENESS; MENTAL EFFORT; REAL-TIME; PERFORMANCE; JUDGMENT; DESIGN; INTERFACE; COHESION; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853560
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A significant amount of work is invested in human-machine teaming (HMT) across multiple fields. Accurately and effectively measuring system performance of an HMT is crucial for moving the design of these systems forward. Metrics are the enabling tools to devise a benchmark in any system and serve as an evaluation platform for assessing the performance, along with the verification and validation, of a system. Currently, there is no agreed-upon set of benchmark metrics for developing HMT systems. Therefore, identification and classification of common metrics are imperative to create a benchmark in the HMT field. The key focus of this review is to conduct a detailed survey aimed at identification of metrics employed in different segments of HMT and to determine the common metrics that can be used in the future to benchmark HMTs. We have organized this review as follows: identification of metrics used in HMTs until now, and classification based on functionality and measuring techniques. Additionally, we have also attempted to analyze all the identified metrics in detail while classifying them as theoretical, applied, real-time, non-real-time, measurable, and observable metrics. We conclude this review with a detailed analysis of the identified common metrics along with their usage to benchmark HMTs.
引用
收藏
页码:38637 / 38655
页数:19
相关论文
共 188 条
[81]   STATECHARTS - A VISUAL FORMALISM FOR COMPLEX-SYSTEMS [J].
HAREL, D .
SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 1987, 8 (03) :231-&
[82]  
Harriott C.E., 2014, P HUM FACT ERG SOC A, V58, P1471
[83]  
Harriott Caroline E., 2013, Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, V9, P94
[84]  
Hart S. G., 2006, Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., V50, P904, DOI [DOI 10.1177/154193120605000909, 10.1177/154193120605000909]
[85]   The impact of Eysenck's extraversion-introversion personality dimension on prospective memory [J].
Heffernan, TM ;
Ling, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 42 (04) :321-325
[86]   A novel eye-tracking method to assess attention allocation in individuals with and without aphasia using a dual-task paradigm [J].
Heuer, Sabine ;
Hallowell, Brooke .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2015, 55 :15-30
[87]   Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams:: An examination of mediating effects [J].
Heuzé, JP ;
Raimbault, N ;
Fontayne, P .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2006, 24 (01) :59-68
[88]  
Hewett T., 1992, ACM SIGCHI CURRICULA
[89]  
Hicks J. S., 2014, ARLTR7151 DTIC
[90]   From human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation [J].
Hoc, JM .
ERGONOMICS, 2000, 43 (07) :833-843