Common Metrics to Benchmark Human-Machine Teams (HMT): A Review

被引:49
作者
Damacharla, Praveen [1 ]
Javaid, Ahmad Y. [1 ]
Gallimore, Jennie J. [2 ]
Devabhaktuni, Vijay K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Bowling Green State Univ, Coll Technol Architecture & Appl Engn, Bowling Green, OH 43402 USA
关键词
Autonomous system; benchmarking; human factors; human-machine teaming (HMT); metrics; performance metrics; robotics; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; SITUATION AWARENESS; MENTAL EFFORT; REAL-TIME; PERFORMANCE; JUDGMENT; DESIGN; INTERFACE; COHESION; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853560
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A significant amount of work is invested in human-machine teaming (HMT) across multiple fields. Accurately and effectively measuring system performance of an HMT is crucial for moving the design of these systems forward. Metrics are the enabling tools to devise a benchmark in any system and serve as an evaluation platform for assessing the performance, along with the verification and validation, of a system. Currently, there is no agreed-upon set of benchmark metrics for developing HMT systems. Therefore, identification and classification of common metrics are imperative to create a benchmark in the HMT field. The key focus of this review is to conduct a detailed survey aimed at identification of metrics employed in different segments of HMT and to determine the common metrics that can be used in the future to benchmark HMTs. We have organized this review as follows: identification of metrics used in HMTs until now, and classification based on functionality and measuring techniques. Additionally, we have also attempted to analyze all the identified metrics in detail while classifying them as theoretical, applied, real-time, non-real-time, measurable, and observable metrics. We conclude this review with a detailed analysis of the identified common metrics along with their usage to benchmark HMTs.
引用
收藏
页码:38637 / 38655
页数:19
相关论文
共 188 条
[1]   Dimensions of fatigue in different working populations [J].
Åhsberg, E .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 41 (03) :231-241
[2]  
Andre A, 1997, HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTION: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, P19
[3]   Subjective rating scales: science or art? [J].
Annett, J .
ERGONOMICS, 2002, 45 (14) :966-987
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1977, Group Organization Studies, DOI [DOI 10.1177/105960117700200404, 10.1177/105960117700200404]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BERKSHIRE ENCY HUMAN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EXPT SOFTWARE ENG, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, IEEE 4TH CONFERENCE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1960, IRE T HUM FACT ELECT, DOI DOI 10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
[9]   A survey of Tactile Human-Robot Interactions [J].
Argall, Brenna D. ;
Billard, Aude G. .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2010, 58 (10) :1159-1176
[10]   Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors [J].
Ash, JS ;
Berg, M ;
Coiera, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2004, 11 (02) :104-112