Arctic Warming Revealed by Multiple CMIP6 Models: Evaluation of Historical Simulations and Quantification of Future Projection Uncertainties

被引:84
作者
Cai, Ziyi [1 ]
You, Qinglong [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Fangying [3 ]
Chen, Hans W. [4 ]
Chen, Deliang [5 ]
Cohen, Judah [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Inst Atmospher Sci, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Zhuhai Fudan Innovat Res Inst, Innovat Ctr Ocean & Atmosphere Syst, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Minist Educ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, Lund, Sweden
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Earth Sci, Reg Climate Grp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Atmospher & Environm Res Inc, Lexington, MA USA
[7] MIT, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Arctic; Climate prediction; Temperature; Coupled models; Model evaluation/performance; SURFACE AIR-TEMPERATURE; SEA-ICE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AMPLIFICATION; CHINA; PRECIPITATION; FEEDBACKS; GREENLAND; ATLANTIC; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0791.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Arctic has experienced a warming rate higher than the global mean in the past decades, but previous studies show that there are large uncertainties associated with future Arctic temperature projections. In this study, near-surface mean temperatures in the Arctic are analyzed from 22 models participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Compared with the ERA5 reanalysis, most CMIP6 models underestimate the observed mean temperature in the Arctic during 1979-2014. The largest cold biases are found over the Greenland Sea the Barents Sea, and the Kara Sea. Under the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, the multimodel ensemble mean of 22 CMIP6 models exhibits significant Arctic warming in the future and the warming rate is more than twice that of the global/Northern Hemisphere mean. Model spread is the largest contributor to the overall uncertainty in projections, which accounts for 55.4% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections in 2015 and remains at 32.9% at the end of projections in 2095. Internal variability uncertainty accounts for 39.3% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections but decreases to 6.5% at the end of the twenty-first century, while scenario uncertainty rapidly increases from 5.3% to 60.7% over the period from 2015 to 2095. It is found that the largest model uncertainties are consistent cold bias in the oceanic regions in the models, which is connected with excessive sea ice area caused by the weak Atlantic poleward heat transport. These results suggest that large intermodel spread and uncertainties exist in the CMIP6 models' simulation and projection of the Arctic near-surface temperature and that there are different responses over the ocean and land in the Arctic to greenhouse gas forcing. Future research needs to pay more attention to the different characteristics and mechanisms of Arctic Ocean and land warming to reduce the spread.
引用
收藏
页码:4871 / 4892
页数:22
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Projections of Precipitation and Temperature over the South Asian Countries in CMIP6 [J].
Almazroui, Mansour ;
Saeed, Sajjad ;
Saeed, Fahad ;
Islam, M. Nazrul ;
Ismail, Muhammad .
EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 4 (02) :297-320
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Geoinformatics Geostatistics: An Overview, DOI [10.4172/2327-4581.1000103, DOI 10.4172/2327-4581.1000103]
[3]   On the Contribution of Longwave Radiation to Global Climate Model Biases in Arctic Lower Tropospheric Stability [J].
Barton, Neil P. ;
Klein, Stephen A. ;
Boyle, James S. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (19) :7250-7269
[4]   Weakened evidence for mid-latitude impacts of Arctic warming [J].
Blackport, Russell ;
Screen, James A. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (12) :1065-1066
[5]   Seasonal energy exchange in sea ice retreat regions contributes to differences in projected Arctic warming [J].
Boeke, Robyn C. ;
Taylor, Patrick C. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
[6]   Sources of Uncertainty in the Meridional Pattern of Climate Change [J].
Bonan, D. B. ;
Armour, K. C. ;
Roe, G. H. ;
Siler, N. ;
Feldl, N. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (17) :9131-9140
[7]   Key indicators of Arctic climate change: 1971-2017 [J].
Box, Jason E. ;
Colgan, William T. ;
Christensen, Torben Rojle ;
Schmidt, Niels Martin ;
Lund, Magnus ;
Parmentier, Frans-Jan W. ;
Brown, Ross ;
Bhatt, Uma S. ;
Euskirchen, Eugenie S. ;
Romanovsky, Vladimir E. ;
Walsh, John E. ;
Overland, James E. ;
Wang, Muyin ;
Corell, Robert W. ;
Meier, Walter N. ;
Wouters, Bert ;
Mernild, Sebastian ;
Mard, Johanna ;
Pawlak, Janet ;
Olsen, Morten Skovgard .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (04)
[8]   Twenty first century changes in Antarctic and Southern Ocean surface climate in CMIP6 [J].
Bracegirdle, Thomas J. ;
Krinner, Gerhard ;
Tonelli, Marcos ;
Haumann, F. Alexander ;
Naughten, Kaitlin A. ;
Rackow, Thomas ;
Roach, Lettie A. ;
Wainer, Ilana .
ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 21 (09)
[9]   Simulations of Arctic temperature and pressure by global coupled models [J].
Chapman, William L. ;
Walsh, John E. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2007, 20 (04) :609-632
[10]   Probabilistic Projections of Climate Change over China under the SRES A1B Scenario Using 28 AOGCMs [J].
Chen, Weilin ;
Jiang, Zhihong ;
Li, Laurent .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (17) :4741-4756