Changes in life quality following third molar surgery - the immediate postoperative period

被引:133
作者
McGrath, C [1 ]
Comfort, MB [1 ]
Lo, ECM [1 ]
Luo, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4809930
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study describes patients' perceptions of changes in oral health related quality of life (OHQOL) in the early postoperative period following third molar surgery. Methods One hundred patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study of the surgical removal of lower third molars under local anaesthetic. Two specific oral health related quality of life measures, OHIP-14 and OHQoLUK(C) were administered to the study group prior to surgery. Standardized surgical and analgesic protocols were followed. Patients kept a diary of changes in life quality each postoperative day (POD) for 7 days, completing both OHIP-14 and OHQoLUK(C) daily. Results Both oral health related quality of life measures identified a significant deterioration in quality of life on POD1 (P<0.01) and this remained evident on POD2 (P<0.01), POD3 (P<0.01), POD4 (P<0.01) and PODS (P<0.05). By POD6 and POD7 there was no significant difference in quality of life compared with preoperative status (P>0.05). Deterioration in life quality over the study period was associated with postoperative clinical findings (P<0.05): swelling and trismus. Conclusion The study concludes that there is a significant deterioration in oral health related quality of life in the immediate postoperative period following third molar surgery; particularly during the first five days. This is associated with postoperative clinical findings. This has implication for patients deciding on third molar surgery and informed consent.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 268
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[2]  
Bedi, 1999, Int J Health Promot Educ, V37, P116
[3]   Factors influencing nerve damage during lower third molar surgery [J].
Brann, CR ;
Brickley, MR ;
Shepherd, JP .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1999, 186 (10) :514-516
[4]  
Dimitroulis GA, 1997, SYNOPSIS MINOR ORAL
[5]   The minor oral surgery outcome scale: A multi-attribute patient-derived outcome measure [J].
Goodey, RD ;
Brickley, MR ;
Armstrong, RA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (10) :1096-1101
[7]   3RD MOLAR SURGERY - AN AUDIT OF THE INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY, POSTOPERATIVE COMPLAINTS AND PATIENT SATISFACTION [J].
LOPES, V ;
MUMENYA, R ;
FEINMANN, C ;
HARRIS, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 33 (01) :33-35
[8]  
McGrath C, 2001, Community Dent Health, V18, P138
[9]  
McGrath C, 1999, Prim Dent Care, V6, P53
[10]   RISKS AND BENEFITS OF REMOVAL OF IMPACTED 3RD MOLARS - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
MERCIER, P ;
PRECIOUS, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1992, 21 (01) :17-27