Producing Trust Among Illicit Actors: A Techno-Social Approach to an Online Illicit Market

被引:16
作者
Bancroft, Angus [1 ]
Squirrell, Tim [2 ]
Zaunseder, Andreas [3 ]
Rafanell, Irene [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sociol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Sci Technol & Innovat Studies, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Ctr Citizenship Civil Soc & Rule Law, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Univ West Scotland, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
关键词
cryptomarkets; darknet; drugs; trust; digital sociology; DRUG MARKETS; CRYPTOMARKETS;
D O I
10.1177/1360780419881158
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Illicit market exchanges in cybercriminal markets are plagued by problems of verifiability and enforceability: trust is one way to ensure reliable exchange. It is fragile and hard to establish. One way to do that is to use the administrative structure of the digital market to control transactions. This is common among a specific type of market - darknet cryptomarkets. These are sites for the sale of illicit goods and services, hosted anonymously using the Tor darknet. However, reliance by users on the technology and the market administrators exposes users to excessive risk. We examine a case of a market that rejects several key technological features now common in cryptomarkets but that is nonetheless reliable and robust. We apply a techno-social approach that looks at the way participants use and combine technologies with trust relationships. The study was designed to capture the interactional context of the illicit market. We aimed to examine both person-to-person interaction and the technical infrastructure the market relied on. We find that the social space of the market maintains itself through a shared common security orientation, community participation in key decisions about products sold, performing trust signalling, and relying on lateral trust between members. There are implications for how resilience in cryptomarkets is understood.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 472
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Afilipoaie A., 2018, Global Drug Policy Observatory Report
[2]  
Aldridge J, 2014, NOT E BAY DRUGS CRYP
[3]   Hidden wholesale: The drug diffusing capacity of online drug cryptomarkets [J].
Aldridge, Judith ;
Decary-Hetu, David .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2016, 35 :7-15
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, DEALER DOORSTEP DRUG
[5]   Sellers' risk perceptions in public and private social media drug markets [J].
Bakken, Silje Anderdal ;
Demant, Jakob Johan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2019, 73 :255-262
[6]   Coordination problems in cryptomarkets: Changes in cooperation, competition and valuation [J].
Bakken, Silje Anderdal ;
Moeller, Kim ;
Sandberg, Sveinung .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2018, 15 (04) :442-460
[7]   STATUS GROUPS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION [J].
BARNES, B .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 26 (02) :259-270
[8]   Safer scoring? Cryptomarkets, social supply and drug market violence [J].
Barratt, Monica J. ;
Ferris, Jason A. ;
Winstock, Adam R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2016, 35 :24-31
[9]   'What if you live on top of a bakery and you like cakes?' - Drug use and harm trajectories before, during and after the emergence of Silk Road [J].
Barratt, Monica J. ;
Lentonb, Simon ;
Maddox, Alexia ;
Allen, Matthew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2016, 35 :50-57
[10]   Everything you always wanted to know about drug cryptomarkets* (*but were afraid to ask) [J].
Barratt, Monica J. ;
Aldridge, Judith .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2016, 35 :1-6