Neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma is associated with higher R0 rate compared to upfront surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Terlizzi, Mario [1 ]
Buscail, Etienne [2 ]
Boussari, Olayide [3 ]
Adgie, Sarah [1 ]
Leduc, Nicolas [1 ]
Terrebonne, Eric [4 ]
Smith, Denis [4 ]
Blanc, Jean-Frederic [4 ]
Lapuyade, Bruno [5 ]
Laurent, Christophe [2 ]
Chiche, Laurence [2 ]
Belleannee, Genevieve [6 ]
Le Malicot, Karine [3 ]
Trouette, Renaud [1 ]
Pouypoudat, Claudia [1 ]
Vendrely, Veronique [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Radiotherapie, Bordeaux, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Chirurg, Bordeaux, France
[3] FFCD, Dept Biostat, Dijon, France
[4] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Oncol Med, Bordeaux, France
[5] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Imagerie Med, Bordeaux, France
[6] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Anatomopathol, Bordeaux, France
[7] Univ Bordeaux, BMGIC, INSERM, U1035, Bordeaux, France
关键词
Borderline pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment; R0; rate; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; GEMCITABINE; FOLFIRINOX; THERAPY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2021.1944662
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is debated for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). This retrospective study assessed the impact of NAT on R0 rate and survival for BRPC patients in comparison with upfront surgery (US). Material and methods Between 2010 and 2017 patient records for all consecutive patients treated for BRPC according to NCCN 2017 were reviewed. The endpoints analysed were R0 rate, recurrence-free-survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Seventy-nine patients were included: 63 (79.7%) patients received NAT and 16 (20.3%) were upfront operated. NAT consisted in FOLFIRINOX (median cycles: 5, range 4-8) followed by chemoradiation (n = 55, 87.3%, median dose: 54 Gy). Thirty-nine (61.9%) patients had resection. R0 rate was higher in the NAT group considering a margin clearance of 0 mm (94.9%) or 1 mm (89.7%) compared to the US group (68.8% and 43.8% respectively). In the whole population, median RFS was 12.6 [95%CI: 10.5-22.1] in the NAT group vs 7.7 [95%CI: 4.4-14] months in the US group (p < 0.01). Median OS was 29.0 [95%CI: 23.5-63.1] and 27.2 [95%CI: 11.6-38.8] months in the NAT and US groups respectively (p = 0.06). In operated patients the NAT group achieved better RFS and OS than the US group (p < 0.01 for both). In multivariate analysis NAT, surgical resection and age <65 (p < 0.01 for both) were prognostic of RFS. NAT, surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic of OS (p < 0.05 for all). In operated patients (n = 55) multivariate analysis showed that N1 status was associated with decreased RFS; age < 65 and NAT were associated with a longer RFS. Receiving a NAT, an adjuvant chemotherapy and achieving a ypT0-1N0 status were associated with better OS. NAT was well tolerated with 14.3% grade >= 3 toxicities. Conclusion NAT permitted a high R0 rate with a 0- or 1-mm clearance margin and was associated with better RFS and OS for patients with BRPC.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1121
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relationship between surgical R0 resectability and findings of peripancreatic vascular invasion on CT imaging after neoadjuvant S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Yasuta, Sho
    Kobayashi, Tatsushi
    Aizawa, Hidetoshi
    Takahashi, Shinichiro
    Ikeda, Masafumi
    Konishi, Masaru
    Kojima, Motohiro
    Kuno, Hirofumi
    Uesaka, Katsuhiko
    Morinaga, Soichiro
    Miyamoto, Atsushi
    Toyama, Hirochika
    Takakura, Norihisa
    Sugimachi, Keishi
    Takayama, Wataru
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [42] Comparison of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery first for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huan, Lu
    Yu, Fucai
    Cao, Ding
    Zhou, Hantao
    Qin, Maoling
    Cao, Yang
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):
  • [43] Arterial involvement and resectability scoring system to predict R0 resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy
    Noda, Yoshifumi
    Pisuchpen, Nisanard
    Mercaldo, Nathaniel D.
    Sekigami, Yurie
    Michelakos, Theodoros
    Parakh, Anushri
    Wo, Jennifer Y.
    Qadan, Motaz
    Ferrone, Cristina
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Ryan, David P.
    Clark, Jeffrey W.
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Kambadakone, Avinash R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 2470 - 2480
  • [44] A phase II trial proposal of total neoadjuvant treatment with primary chemotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and intraoperative radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Paiella, Salvatore
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Simoni, Nicola
    Micera, Renato
    Guariglia, Stefania
    Cavedon, Carlo
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Esposito, Alessandro
    Landoni, Luca
    Casetti, Luca
    Tuveri, Massimiliano
    Milella, Michele
    Secchettin, Erica
    Manzini, Gessica
    Bovo, Chiara
    De Pastena, Matteo
    Fontana, Martina
    Salvia, Roberto
    Mazzarotto, Renzo
    Bassi, Claudio
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [45] Risk Factors Associated With Early Recurrence of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy and Curative Resection
    Tsuchiya, Nobuhiro
    Matsuyama, Ryusei
    Murakami, Takashi
    Yabushita, Yasuhiro
    Sawada, Yu
    Kumamoto, Takafumi
    Endo, Itaru
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (08) : 4431 - 4440
  • [46] Validation of the Anatomical and Biological Definitions of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer According to the 2017 International Consensus for Survival and Recurrence in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Upfront Surgery
    Lee, Boram
    Yoon, Yoo-Seok
    Kang, MeeYoung
    Park, Yeshong
    Lee, Eunhye
    Jo, Yeongsoo
    Lee, Jun Suh
    Lee, Hae Won
    Cho, Jai Young
    Han, Ho-Seong
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (06) : 3444 - 3454
  • [47] The Right Treatment Strategy for the Right Patient: A Biomarker-Driven Approach to Neoadjuvant vs. Surgery-First Management of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Nahm, Christopher B.
    Turchini, John
    Sahni, Sumit
    Moon, Elizabeth
    Itchins, Malinda
    Arena, Jennifer
    Chou, Angela
    Colvin, Emily K.
    Howell, Viive M.
    Pavlakis, Nick
    Clarke, Stephen
    Samra, Jaswinder S.
    Gill, Anthony J.
    Mittal, Anubhav
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [48] Predictive factors of actual 5-y recurrence-free survival after upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer Exploration of patients who did not require neoadjuvant treatment
    Uemura, Masao
    Sugiura, Teiichi
    Ashida, Ryo
    Ohgi, Katsuhisa
    Yamada, Mihoko
    Otsuka, Shimpei
    Aramaki, Takeshi
    Notsu, Akifumi
    Uesaka, Katsuhiko
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2024, 8 (06): : 1126 - 1136
  • [49] Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (BR/LA PDAC) in the Era of Modern Neoadjuvant Treatment: Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes
    Harrison, Jon M.
    Wo, Jennifer Y.
    Ferrone, Cristina R.
    Horick, Nora K.
    Keane, Florence K.
    Qadan, Motaz
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Clark, Jeffrey W.
    Blaszkowsky, Lawrence S.
    Allen, Jill N.
    Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 1400 - 1406
  • [50] Clinical results of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after R0 surgery: A retrospective study
    Comito, T.
    Cozzi, L.
    Zerbi, A.
    Franzese, C.
    Clerici, E.
    Tozzi, A.
    Iftode, C.
    Navarria, P.
    D'Agostino, G.
    Fogliata, A.
    Mancosu, P.
    Tomatis, S.
    Carnaghi, C.
    Personeni, N.
    Santoro, A.
    Scorsetti, M.
    EJSO, 2017, 43 (04): : 735 - 742