Neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma is associated with higher R0 rate compared to upfront surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Terlizzi, Mario [1 ]
Buscail, Etienne [2 ]
Boussari, Olayide [3 ]
Adgie, Sarah [1 ]
Leduc, Nicolas [1 ]
Terrebonne, Eric [4 ]
Smith, Denis [4 ]
Blanc, Jean-Frederic [4 ]
Lapuyade, Bruno [5 ]
Laurent, Christophe [2 ]
Chiche, Laurence [2 ]
Belleannee, Genevieve [6 ]
Le Malicot, Karine [3 ]
Trouette, Renaud [1 ]
Pouypoudat, Claudia [1 ]
Vendrely, Veronique [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Radiotherapie, Bordeaux, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Chirurg, Bordeaux, France
[3] FFCD, Dept Biostat, Dijon, France
[4] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Oncol Med, Bordeaux, France
[5] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Imagerie Med, Bordeaux, France
[6] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Anatomopathol, Bordeaux, France
[7] Univ Bordeaux, BMGIC, INSERM, U1035, Bordeaux, France
关键词
Borderline pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment; R0; rate; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; GEMCITABINE; FOLFIRINOX; THERAPY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2021.1944662
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is debated for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). This retrospective study assessed the impact of NAT on R0 rate and survival for BRPC patients in comparison with upfront surgery (US). Material and methods Between 2010 and 2017 patient records for all consecutive patients treated for BRPC according to NCCN 2017 were reviewed. The endpoints analysed were R0 rate, recurrence-free-survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Seventy-nine patients were included: 63 (79.7%) patients received NAT and 16 (20.3%) were upfront operated. NAT consisted in FOLFIRINOX (median cycles: 5, range 4-8) followed by chemoradiation (n = 55, 87.3%, median dose: 54 Gy). Thirty-nine (61.9%) patients had resection. R0 rate was higher in the NAT group considering a margin clearance of 0 mm (94.9%) or 1 mm (89.7%) compared to the US group (68.8% and 43.8% respectively). In the whole population, median RFS was 12.6 [95%CI: 10.5-22.1] in the NAT group vs 7.7 [95%CI: 4.4-14] months in the US group (p < 0.01). Median OS was 29.0 [95%CI: 23.5-63.1] and 27.2 [95%CI: 11.6-38.8] months in the NAT and US groups respectively (p = 0.06). In operated patients the NAT group achieved better RFS and OS than the US group (p < 0.01 for both). In multivariate analysis NAT, surgical resection and age <65 (p < 0.01 for both) were prognostic of RFS. NAT, surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic of OS (p < 0.05 for all). In operated patients (n = 55) multivariate analysis showed that N1 status was associated with decreased RFS; age < 65 and NAT were associated with a longer RFS. Receiving a NAT, an adjuvant chemotherapy and achieving a ypT0-1N0 status were associated with better OS. NAT was well tolerated with 14.3% grade >= 3 toxicities. Conclusion NAT permitted a high R0 rate with a 0- or 1-mm clearance margin and was associated with better RFS and OS for patients with BRPC.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1121
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-Term Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Shin, Kyung In
    Yoon, Min Sung
    Kim, Jee Hoon
    Jang, Won Joon
    Leem, Galam
    Jo, Jung Hyun
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Park, Seung Woo
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Kim, Seung-seob
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Bang, Seungmin
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (22):
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen
    Yoo, Changhoon
    Kang, Jihoon
    Kim, Kyu-Pyo
    Lee, Jae-Lyun
    Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
    Chang, Heung-Moon
    Lee, Sang Soo
    Park, Do Hyun
    Song, Tae Jun
    Seo, Dong Wan
    Lee, Sung Koo
    Kim, Myung-Hwan
    Park, Jin-Hong
    Hwang, Dae Wook
    Song, Ki Byung
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Song Cheol
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (28) : 46337 - 46347
  • [33] Long-term outcome following neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer compared to upfront surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative studies by intention-to-treat analysis
    Unno, Michiaki
    Hata, Tatsuo
    Motoi, Fuyuhiko
    SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (04) : 295 - 299
  • [34] Upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma with venous encasement more than 180 degree, comparative study
    Khalil, Ahmed
    Sabry, Ahmed Mohamed
    Sherif, Diaa Eldin M.
    Zaid, Mohamed H. H.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 42 (02) : 482 - 487
  • [35] Oncological Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 2/3 Trial
    Jang, Jin-Young
    Han, Youngmin
    Lee, Hongeun
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    Kwon, Wooil
    Lee, Kyung-Hun
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Heo, Jin Seok
    Park, Joon Oh
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Park, Sang Jae
    Lee, Woo Jin
    Koh, Young Hwan
    Park, Joon Seong
    Yoon, Dong Sup
    Lee, Lk Jae
    Choi, Seong Ho
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (02) : 215 - 222
  • [36] A hypofractionated radiation regimen avoids the lymphopenia associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Crocenzi, Todd
    Cottam, Benjamin
    Newell, Pippa
    Wolf, Ronald F.
    Hansen, Paul D.
    Hammill, Chet
    Solhjem, Matthew C.
    To, Yue-Yun
    Greathouse, Amy
    Tormoen, Garth
    Jutric, Zeljka
    Young, Kristina
    Bahjat, Keith S.
    Gough, Michael J.
    Crittenden, Marka R.
    JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2016, 4
  • [37] Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after neoadjuvant therapy is associated with worse survival after resection of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Glazer, Evan S.
    Rashid, Omar M.
    Pimiento, Jose M.
    Hodul, Pamela J.
    Malafa, Mokenge P.
    SURGERY, 2016, 160 (05) : 1288 - 1293
  • [38] Can a simplified CT response criteria for vascular involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy predict survival in patients who achieved subsequent R0 resection?
    Guo, Yang
    Czeyda-Pommersheim, Ferenc
    Miccio, Joseph A.
    Mahalingam, Sowmya
    Cecchini, Michael
    Pahade, Jay
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (12) : 5609 - 5617
  • [39] Long-term outcome following neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer compared to upfront surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative studies by intention-to-treat analysis
    Michiaki Unno
    Tatsuo Hata
    Fuyuhiko Motoi
    Surgery Today, 2019, 49 : 295 - 299
  • [40] Comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatments in patients with resectable, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    He, Jiaxin
    Lv, Na
    Yang, Zhenyi
    Luo, Yixuan
    Zhong, Wen
    Wu, Chunli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (06) : 3900 - 3909