Neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma is associated with higher R0 rate compared to upfront surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Terlizzi, Mario [1 ]
Buscail, Etienne [2 ]
Boussari, Olayide [3 ]
Adgie, Sarah [1 ]
Leduc, Nicolas [1 ]
Terrebonne, Eric [4 ]
Smith, Denis [4 ]
Blanc, Jean-Frederic [4 ]
Lapuyade, Bruno [5 ]
Laurent, Christophe [2 ]
Chiche, Laurence [2 ]
Belleannee, Genevieve [6 ]
Le Malicot, Karine [3 ]
Trouette, Renaud [1 ]
Pouypoudat, Claudia [1 ]
Vendrely, Veronique [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Radiotherapie, Bordeaux, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Chirurg, Bordeaux, France
[3] FFCD, Dept Biostat, Dijon, France
[4] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Oncol Med, Bordeaux, France
[5] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Imagerie Med, Bordeaux, France
[6] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Anatomopathol, Bordeaux, France
[7] Univ Bordeaux, BMGIC, INSERM, U1035, Bordeaux, France
关键词
Borderline pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment; R0; rate; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; GEMCITABINE; FOLFIRINOX; THERAPY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2021.1944662
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is debated for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). This retrospective study assessed the impact of NAT on R0 rate and survival for BRPC patients in comparison with upfront surgery (US). Material and methods Between 2010 and 2017 patient records for all consecutive patients treated for BRPC according to NCCN 2017 were reviewed. The endpoints analysed were R0 rate, recurrence-free-survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Seventy-nine patients were included: 63 (79.7%) patients received NAT and 16 (20.3%) were upfront operated. NAT consisted in FOLFIRINOX (median cycles: 5, range 4-8) followed by chemoradiation (n = 55, 87.3%, median dose: 54 Gy). Thirty-nine (61.9%) patients had resection. R0 rate was higher in the NAT group considering a margin clearance of 0 mm (94.9%) or 1 mm (89.7%) compared to the US group (68.8% and 43.8% respectively). In the whole population, median RFS was 12.6 [95%CI: 10.5-22.1] in the NAT group vs 7.7 [95%CI: 4.4-14] months in the US group (p < 0.01). Median OS was 29.0 [95%CI: 23.5-63.1] and 27.2 [95%CI: 11.6-38.8] months in the NAT and US groups respectively (p = 0.06). In operated patients the NAT group achieved better RFS and OS than the US group (p < 0.01 for both). In multivariate analysis NAT, surgical resection and age <65 (p < 0.01 for both) were prognostic of RFS. NAT, surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic of OS (p < 0.05 for all). In operated patients (n = 55) multivariate analysis showed that N1 status was associated with decreased RFS; age < 65 and NAT were associated with a longer RFS. Receiving a NAT, an adjuvant chemotherapy and achieving a ypT0-1N0 status were associated with better OS. NAT was well tolerated with 14.3% grade >= 3 toxicities. Conclusion NAT permitted a high R0 rate with a 0- or 1-mm clearance margin and was associated with better RFS and OS for patients with BRPC.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1121
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gemcitabine-Based Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data
    Giovinazzo, Francesco
    Soggiu, Fiammetta
    Jang, Jin-Young
    Versteijne, Eva
    van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    van Eijck, Casper H.
    Han, Youngmin
    Choi, Seong Ho
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Zalupski, Mark
    Ahmad, Hasham
    Yentz, Sarah
    Helton, Scott
    Rose, J. Bart
    Takishita, Chie
    Nagakawa, Yuichi
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [22] Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    van Dam, Jacob L.
    Janssen, Quisette P.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Homs, Marjolein Y., V
    van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
    van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    de Wilde, Roeland F.
    Wilmink, Johanna W.
    van Eijck, Casper H. J.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 160 : 140 - 149
  • [23] Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Current Status of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treatment in Japan
    Ei, Shigenori
    Takahashi, Shinichiro
    Ogasawara, Toshihito
    Mashiko, Taro
    Masuoka, Yoshihito
    Nakagohri, Toshio
    GUT AND LIVER, 2023, 17 (05) : 698 - 710
  • [24] Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine plus S-1 for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Compared with Upfront Surgery
    Kitano, Yuki
    Inoue, Yosuke
    Takeda, Tsuyoshi
    Oba, Atsushi
    Ono, Yoshihiro
    Sato, Takafumi
    Ito, Hiromichi
    Ozaka, Masato
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Sasahira, Naoki
    Baba, Hideo
    Takahashi, Yu
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (8) : 5093 - 5102
  • [25] Relationship of Time to First Therapy and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery Approach in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Al Masad, Qusai
    Sousa, Aryanna
    Pena, Paola
    Sammartino, Cara J.
    Somasundar, Ponnandai
    Abdelfattah, Thaer
    Espat, N. Joseph
    Calvino, Abdul S.
    Kwon, Steve
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 306 : 111 - 121
  • [26] Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment in a series of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Tinchon, Christoph
    Hubmann, Eva
    Pichler, Angelika
    Keil, Felix
    Pichler, Martin
    Rabl, Hans
    Uggowitzer, Martin
    Jilek, Kurt
    Leitner, Gerhard
    Bauernhofer, Thomas
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (06) : 1231 - 1234
  • [27] Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Dutch Randomized PREOPANC Trial
    Versteijne, Eva
    van Dam, Jacob L.
    Suker, Mustafa
    Janssen, Quisette P.
    Groothuis, Karin
    Akkermans-Vogelaar, Janine M.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Bonsing, Bert A.
    Buijsen, Jeroen
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Creemers, Geert-Jan M.
    van Dam, Ronald M.
    Eskens, Ferry A. L. M.
    Festen, Sebastiaan
    de Groot, Jan Willem B.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    de Hingh, Ignace H.
    Homs, Marjolein Y., V
    van Hooft, Jeanin E.
    Kerver, Emile D.
    Luelmo, Saskia A. C.
    Neelis, Karen J.
    Nuyttens, Joost
    Paardekooper, Gabriel M. R. M.
    Patijn, Gijs A.
    van der Sangen, Maurice J. C.
    de Vos-Geelen, Judith
    Wilmink, Johanna W.
    Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
    Punt, Cornelis J.
    van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    van Eijck, Casper H. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (11) : 1220 - +
  • [28] Comparison of the upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Si-qi
    Zou, Rui-qi
    Dai, Yu-shi
    Li, Fu-yu
    Hu, Hai-jie
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2024, 76 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [29] Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy After Upfront Chemotherapy Improves Pathologic Outcomes Compared With Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Without Increasing Perioperative Toxicity
    Hill, Colin S.
    Rosati, Lauren M.
    Hu, Chen
    Fu, Wei
    Sehgal, Shuchi
    Hacker-Prietz, Amy
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Weiss, Matthew J.
    Burkhart, Richard A.
    Hruban, Ralph H.
    De Jesus-Acosta, Ana
    Le, Dung T.
    Zheng, Lei
    Laheru, Daniel A.
    He, Jin
    Narang, Amol K.
    Herman, Joseph M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 2456 - 2468
  • [30] Resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: Is R0 resection an illusion? Genetic evaluation of venous resection margin affirmed unrecognized disease
    Turrini, O.
    Gilabert, M.
    Ewald, J.
    Moutardier, V.
    Delpero, J. -R.
    Iovanna, J. -L.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2017, 154 (05) : 329 - 333