Lesions predictive for prostate cancer in a screened population:: First and second screening round findings

被引:41
作者
Postma, R
Roobol, M
Schröder, FH
van der Kwast, TH
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Josephine Nefkens Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate cancer; screening; needle biopsy; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; lesions suspicious for prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1002/pros.20105
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. We evaluated the incidence of prostate cancer, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and lesions suspicious for prostate cancer (LSPC) in sextant biopsies in two subsequent screening rounds at a 4-year interval and their predictive value for subsequent prostate cancer detection. METHODS. In the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), 4,117 men underwent sextant biopsy in the 1st screening round. The 2nd round was performed at a 4-year interval and biopsies were taken in 1,840 men. RESULTS. The incidences of prostate cancer, LSPC and PIN in the 1st, respectively 2nd round were 24.6, resp. 19.9% (P = 0.001), 2.7, resp. 2.8% and 0.8, resp. 2.5% (P < 0.0001). Prostate cancer incidence after repeat biopsy for LSPC in the 1st, respectively 2nd round was 36.7 and 17.0%, and after repeat biopsy for PIN 13.3% in both rounds, respectively. Men with a benign biopsy in the 1st round had a significantly lower prostate cancer incidence in the 2nd round compared to men who did not undergo biopsy in the 1st round (10.7 vs. 22.7%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. The decrease of prostate cancer detection in the 2nd round was associated with an increase in the incidence of PIN. Strikingly, LSPC diagnosed during the 1st round, but not during the 2nd round were predictive for prostate cancer, while isolated PIN was never predictive for prostate cancer. PIN shoud not be an indication for repeat biopsy in a screening population. Importantly a 1st round benign biopsy outcome proved to be a negative predictor of subsequent prostate cancer detection. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 266
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Allam CK, 1996, MODERN PATHOL, V9, P742
  • [2] Repeat biopsy strategies for men with atypical diagnoses on initial prostate needle biopsy
    Allen, EA
    Kahane, H
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (05) : 803 - 807
  • [3] THE INCIDENCE OF HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN NEEDLE BIOPSIES
    BOSTWICK, DG
    QIAN, JQ
    FRANKEL, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (05) : 1791 - 1794
  • [4] BOSTWICK DG, 1994, AM J SURG PATHOL, V18, P1069
  • [5] Cheville JC, 1997, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V108, P633
  • [6] Pathological and molecular aspects of prostate cancer
    DeMarzo, AM
    Nelson, WG
    Isaacs, WB
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 361 (9361) : 955 - 964
  • [7] Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: A prospective study of 1,051 men
    Djavan, B
    Zlotta, A
    Remzi, M
    Ghawidel, K
    Basharkhah, A
    Schulman, CC
    Marberger, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) : 1144 - 1148
  • [8] Prevalence and predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate
    Fleshner, NE
    OSullivan, M
    Fair, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02) : 505 - 508
  • [9] Predictors of first repeat biopsy cancer detection with suspected local stage prostate cancer
    Fowler, JE
    Bigler, SA
    Miles, D
    Yalkut, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) : 813 - 818
  • [10] Histopathological prostate cancer characteristics at radical prostatectomy after population based screening
    Hoedemaeker, RF
    Rietbergen, JBW
    Kranse, R
    Schröder, FH
    van der Kwast, TH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) : 411 - 415