Guidelines for Dorsum Preservation in Primary Rhinoplasty

被引:36
作者
Saban, Yves [1 ]
de Salvador, Sylvie [1 ]
机构
[1] FPS Ctr, Dept Rhinoplasty, Nice, France
关键词
guidelines; preservation rhinoplasty; primary rhinoplasty; dorsum preservation; revision; NASAL; ANATOMY; SEPTUM; HUMP;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1723827
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The multiplication of scientific articles related to the fast-growing interest in preservation rhinoplasty (PR) may lead to confusion in the decision-making process, thus requiring a need for guidelines through a focus on benefit-risk ratio and revisions. This study analyzes a 352 consecutive primary rhinoplasties series during a 3 year (2016 to 2019) period with 1-year follow-up. The evaluation of the most appropriate procedure to the patient's nasal anatomy and expectations requires to correlate (1) a convenient classification of nasal profile lines; (2) a review of the dorsum preservation techniques (DP) classified as: full DP, DP+resurfacing, bony cartilaginous disarticulation, and finally traditional rhinoplasty; (3) the role of septoplasties, subdividing this series in two main groups; (4) analyzing the revisions in the different subgroups and to the literature. Thirty-five revisions (9.94%) were done. Correlations between profile lines, surgical procedures, and revisions show (1) 129 straight noses underwent full DP in 88 cases with 5.68% revisions; however, DP+ hump resurfacing in 32 patients with no revision. (2) Among 71 tension noses, 33 underwent full DP with 6 revisions (18.18%), while 32 patients had bony cap resurfacing, 1 revision (3.13%). (3) Among 109 kyphotic noses, 64 patients underwent DP+resurfacing with 10 revisions (15.63%); 27 patients had cartilage-only DP with two revisions (7.41%). (4) In the 43 difficult noses group, revisions were done equally in DP+resurfacing and cartilage-only subgroups. Septum stability modifies the correlations, introducing Cottle's septorhinoplasty in the paradigm. The revision rate is jumping x2.50% when a septoplasty is associated with the rhinoplasty. Correlated to the benefit-risk ratio and the revisions, the following guidelines may be suggested in primary rhinoplasty: (1) Straight noses: full DP, (2) tension noses: DP+dorsum resurfacing and/or Cottle's variations, (3) kyphotic noses: cartilage-only DP, and (4) difficult noses: traditional rhinoplasties.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Impact of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Versus Dorsal Hump Resection on the Internal Nasal Valve: a Quantitative Radiological Study [J].
Abdelwahab, Mohamed A. ;
Neves, Caio A. ;
Patel, Priyesh N. ;
Most, Sam P. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (03) :879-887
[2]  
Apaydin, 2020, EAFPS ROUND TABLE
[3]  
Barelli P A, 1975, Rhinology, V13, P25
[4]  
Boulanger N, 2013, RHINOLOGY, V51, P77, DOI [10.4193/Rhin12.147, 10.4193/Rhino12.147]
[5]  
COTTLE MH, 1954, AMA ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V60, P408
[6]   The Preservation Rhinoplasty: A New Rhinoplasty Revolution [J].
Daniel, Rollin K. .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (02) :228-229
[7]  
Dewes, 2013, REV BRAS CIR, V42
[8]   Spare Roof Technique: A Middle Third New Technique [J].
Ferreira, Miguel Goncalves ;
Monteiro, Daniel ;
Reis, Claudia ;
Almeida e Sousa, Cecilia .
FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 32 (01) :111-116
[9]  
Goksel A., 2020, Preservation rhinoplasty, V3, P216
[10]  
GOLA R, 1989, ANN CHIR PLAST ESTH, V34, P465