Adaptive Networks for Restoration Ecology

被引:68
作者
Raimundo, Rafael L. G. [1 ,2 ]
Guimaraes, Paulo R., Jr. [2 ]
Evans, Darren M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Paraiba, Ctr Ciencias Aplicadas & Educ, Dept Engn & Meio Ambiente, Campus 4, Rio Tinto, PB, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biociencias, Dept Ecol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
ECO-EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS; SPECIES INTERACTIONS; SEED-DISPERSAL; POLLINATION NETWORKS; BIODIVERSITY; ROBUSTNESS; CONSERVATION; COEVOLUTION; RESILIENCE; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tree.2018.06.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The urgent need to restore biodiversity and ecosystem functioning challenges ecology as a predictive science. Restoration ecology would benefit from evolutionary principles embedded within a framework that combines adaptive network models and the phylogenetic structure of ecological interactions. Adaptive network models capture feedbacks between trait evolution, species abundances, and interactions to explain resilience and functional diversity within communities. Phylogenetically-structured network data, increasingly available via next-generation sequencing, inform constraints affecting interaction rewiring. Combined, these approaches can predict eco-evolutionary changes triggered by community manipulation practices, such as translocations and eradications of invasive species. We discuss theoretical and methodological opportunities to bridge network models and data from restoration projects and propose how this can be applied to the functional restoration of ecological interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 675
页数:12
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Ecological fitting by phenotypically flexible genotypes: implications for species associations, community assembly and evolution [J].
Agosta, Salvatore J. ;
Klemens, Jeffrey A. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 11 (11) :1123-1134
[2]   The stability-complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspective [J].
Allesina, Stefano ;
Tang, Si .
POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2015, 57 (01) :63-75
[3]   Network Structure and Selection Asymmetry Drive Coevolution in Species-Rich Antagonistic Interactions [J].
Andreazzi, Cecilia S. ;
Thompson, John N. ;
Guimaraes, Paulo R., Jr. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2017, 190 (01) :99-115
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENCY BIODIVERSITY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Adaptive speciation
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete variorum edition
[7]   How Do Species Interactions Affect Evolutionary Dynamics Across Whole Communities? [J].
Barraclough, Timothy G. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 46, 2015, 46 :25-48
[8]   A common framework for identifying linkage rules across different types of interactions [J].
Bartomeus, Ignasi ;
Gravel, Dominique ;
Tylianakis, Jason M. ;
Aizen, Marcelo A. ;
Dickie, Ian A. ;
Bernard-Verdier, Maud .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 30 (12) :1894-1903
[9]   Harnessing the Power of Genomics to Secure the Future of Seafood [J].
Bernatchez, Louis ;
Wellenreuther, Maren ;
Araneda, Cristin ;
Ashton, David T. ;
Barth, Julia M. I. ;
Beacham, Terry D. ;
Maes, Gregory E. ;
Martinsohn, Jann T. ;
Miller, Kristina M. ;
Naish, Kerry A. ;
Ovenden, Jennifer R. ;
Primmer, Craig R. ;
Suk, Ho Young ;
Therkildsen, Nina O. ;
Withler, Ruth E. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (09) :665-680
[10]   Toward prediction in the restoration of biodiversity [J].
Brudvig, Lars A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (04) :1013-1017