Is patient outcome affected by the administration of intravenous fluid during bowel preparation for colonic surgery?

被引:4
|
作者
Sanders, G. [1 ]
Arthur, C. H. C. [1 ]
Hosie, K. B. [1 ]
Lambert, A. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Derriford Hosp, Dept Surg, Plymouth PL6 8DH, Devon, England
关键词
Picolax (R); colorectal surgery; fluid therapy; transfusion;
D O I
10.1308/003588407X202047
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION We have previously shown that Picolax (R) bowel preparation causes a significant dehydrating effect, which can be minimised by administering a calculated volume of intravenous fluid. The aim of this prospective study was to assess whether peri-operative outcome is affected by administering a calculated volume of intravenous fluid during bowel preparation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients having bowel preparation (Picolax (R): Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Middlesex, UK) prior to colonic surgery were prospectively randomised to receive no intravenous fluid (group 1) or calculated intravenous crystalloid based on their body weight (group 2), during preparation. In both groups, transfusion was protocol-cl riven. Outcome variables measured included intra-operative and postoperative intravenous fluid requirement, hourly recorded urine output for 24 h, number of patients transfused, number of units of blood transfused, time to the passage of flatus, time to having their bowels open, time until tolerating a full diet, complications and length of stay in hospital. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were recruited - group 1 (n = 18) and group 2 (n = 15). There were 24 men and 9 women, median age 69 years (range, 29-86 years). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to age, sex, weight, ASA grade, preoperative haemoglobin concentration, duration or type of operation. The total number of patients receiving a transfusion (P = 0.026) and the number of units of blood transfused (P = 0.017) was significantly greater in group 1. The number of units of blood transfused intraoperatively was significantly greater in group 1 (P= 0.029). Significantly fewer patients had a urine output < 30 ml/h in the first 24-h after operation (P= 0.046) in group 2. There was no difference between groups in other outcomes measures. CONCLUSION This study indicates that a calculated volume of intravenous fluid administered during bowel preparation improves patient outcomes with respect to blood transfusion and postoperative oliguria. We advocate calculated intravenous fluid administration in all patients undergoing bowel preparation prior to colonic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 489
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] The impact of intravenous fluid administration on complication rates in bowel surgery within an enhanced recovery protocol: a randomized controlled trial
    Zakhaleva, J.
    Tam, J.
    Denoya, P. I.
    Bishawi, M.
    Bergamaschi, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (07) : 892 - 899
  • [2] Patient Compliance With Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery
    Kim, Debora
    Wang, Johnny
    Gupta, Abhinav
    Wlodarczyk, Jordan
    Williams, Brian
    Cologne, Kyle
    Lee, Sang
    Koller, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 302 : 697 - 705
  • [3] Outcome of no oral antibiotic prophylaxis and bowel preparation in Crohn's diseases surgery
    Unger, Lukas Walter
    Riss, Stefan
    Argeny, Stanislaus
    Bergmann, Michael
    Bachleitner-Hofmann, Thomas
    Herbst, Friedrich
    Stift, Anton
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2019, 131 (5-6) : 113 - 119
  • [4] Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: are oral, intravenous or both best and is mechanical bowel preparation necessary?
    R. L. Nelson
    M. Hassan
    M. D. Grant
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2020, 24 : 1233 - 1246
  • [5] Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: are oral, intravenous or both best and is mechanical bowel preparation necessary?
    Nelson, R. L.
    Hassan, M.
    Grant, M. D.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (12) : 1233 - 1246
  • [6] Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Colorectal Surgery: A Survey of the Current Status in Korea
    Kang, Byung Mo
    Lee, Kil Yeon
    Park, Sun Jin
    Lee, Suk-Hwan
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2013, 29 (04) : 160 - 166
  • [7] Which goal for fluid therapy during colorectal surgery is followed by the best outcome: near-maximal stroke volume or zero fluid balance?
    Brandstrup, B.
    Svendsen, P. E.
    Rasmussen, M.
    Belhage, B.
    Rodt, S. A.
    Hansen, B.
    Moller, D. R.
    Lundbech, L. B.
    Andersen, N.
    Berg, V.
    Thomassen, N.
    Andersen, S. T.
    Simonsen, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 109 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [8] The effects of perioperative intravenous fluid administration strategy on renal outcomes in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery An observational study
    Lee, Eun-Ho
    Yun, Sung-Cheol
    Lim, Ye-Ji
    Jo, Jun-Young
    Choi, Dae-Kee
    Choi, In-Cheol
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (07)
  • [9] Improved perioperative outcome with norepinephrine and a restrictive fluid administration during open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion
    Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
    Burkhard, Fiona C.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (02) : 66.e21 - 66.e24
  • [10] Efficacy of intravenous fluid warming during goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Choi, Ji-Won
    Kim, Duk-Kyung
    Lee, Seung-Won
    Park, Jung-Bo
    Lee, Gyu-Hong
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (03) : 605 - 612