Quantifying the risk and dosimetric variables of symptomatic brainstem injury after proton beam radiation in pediatric brain tumors

被引:18
|
作者
Upadhyay, Rituraj [1 ]
Liao, Kaiping [2 ]
Grosshans, David R. [3 ]
McGovern, Susan L. [3 ]
McAleer, Mary Frances [3 ]
Zaky, Wafik [4 ]
Chintagumpala, Murali M. [5 ]
Mahajan, Anita [6 ]
Yeboa, Debra Nana [3 ]
Paulino, Arnold C. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, James Canc Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pediat, Houston, TX USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Texas Childrens Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
brainstem injury; pediatric cancer; proton therapy; radiation; HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; IMAGING CHANGES; THERAPY; CHILDREN; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; MEDULLOBLASTOMA; CONSEQUENCES; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1093/neuonc/noac044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Brainstem toxicity after radiation therapy (RT) is a devastating complication and a particular concern with proton radiation (PBT). We investigated the incidence and clinical correlates of brainstem injury in pediatric brain tumors treated with PBT. Methods All patients <21 years with brain tumors treated with PBT at our institution from 2007-2019, with a brainstem Dmean >30 Gy and/or Dmax >50.4 Gy were included. Symptomatic brainstem injury (SBI) was defined as any new or progressive cranial neuropathy, ataxia, and/or motor weakness with corresponding radiographic abnormality within brainstem. Results A total of 595 patients were reviewed and 468 (medulloblastoma = 200, gliomas = 114, ependymoma = 87, ATRT = 43) met our inclusion criteria. Median age at RT was 6.3 years and median prescribed RT dose was 54Gy [RBE]. Fifteen patients (3.2%) developed SBI, at a median of 4 months after RT. Grades 2, 3, 4, and 5 brainstem injuries were seen in 7, 5, 1, and 2 patients respectively. Asymptomatic radiographic changes were seen in 51 patients (10.9%). SBI was significantly higher in patients with age <= 3 years, female gender, ATRT histology, patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue, and those not receiving craniospinal irradiation. Patients with SBI had a significantly higher V50-52. In 2014, our institution started using strict brainstem dose constraints (Dmax <= 57 Gy, Dmean <= 52.4 Gy, and V54 <= 10%). There was a trend towards decrease in SBI from 4.4% (2007-2013) to 1.5% (2014-2019) (P = .089) without affecting survival. Conclusion Our results suggest a low risk of SBI after PBT for pediatric brain tumors, comparable to photon therapy. A lower risk was seen after adopting strict brainstem dose constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:1571 / 1581
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Factors for Radiation Necrosis and Local Recurrence after Proton Beam Therapy for Skull Base Chordoma or Chondrosarcoma
    Takahashi, Mizuki
    Mizumoto, Masashi
    Oshiro, Yoshiko
    Kino, Hiroyoshi
    Akutsu, Hiroyoshi
    Nakai, Kei
    Sumiya, Taisuke
    Ishikawa, Eiichi
    Maruo, Kazushi
    Sakurai, Hideyuki
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (23)
  • [42] Second cancer risk after primary cancer treatment with three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, or proton beam radiation therapy
    Xiang, Michael
    Chang, Daniel T.
    Pollom, Erqi L.
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (15) : 3560 - 3568
  • [43] Radiation-Induced Moyamoya Syndrome after Proton Beam Therapy in the Pediatric Patient: A Case Series
    Reynolds, Matthew R.
    Haydon, Devon H.
    Caird, John
    Leonard, Jeffrey R.
    PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 51 (06) : 297 - 301
  • [44] Intensive care unit variables and outcome after pediatric traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study of survivors
    Salorio, Cynthia F.
    Slomine, Beth S.
    Guerguerian, Anne-Marie
    Christensen, James R.
    White, Jeanette R. M.
    Natale, JoAnne E.
    Shaffner, Donald H.
    Grados, Marco A.
    Vasa, Roma A.
    Gerring, Joan P.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [45] Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes
    Kralik, John C.
    Xi, Liwen
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Lin, Liyong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (06): : 41 - 50
  • [46] Sleep disturbances after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of prevalence, risk factors, and association with recovery
    Luther, Madison
    Cordts, Katrina M. Poppert
    Williams, Cydni N.
    SLEEP, 2020, 43 (10)
  • [47] Risk factors and rates of bone flap resorption in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury Clinical article
    Bowers, Christian A.
    Riva-Cambrin, Jay
    Hertzler, Dean A., II
    Walker, Marion L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2013, 11 (05) : 526 - 532
  • [48] Preservation of Neurocognition after Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Intracranial Tumors: First Results from REGI-MA-002015
    Flechl, Birgit
    Konrath, Lisa
    Luetgendorf-Caucig, Carola
    Achtaewa, Milana
    Hug, Eugen B.
    Georg, Petra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 115 (05): : 1102 - 1114
  • [49] The risk of radiation-induced second cancers in the high to medium dose region: a comparison between passive and scanned proton therapy, IMRT and VMAT for pediatric patients with brain tumors
    Moteabbed, Maryam
    Yock, Torunn I.
    Paganetti, Harald
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (12) : 2883 - 2899
  • [50] Evolution and Dosimetric Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Detected Brain Stem Injury After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Huang, Xiao-Dan
    Li, Yang-Chan
    Chen, Fo-Ping
    Zheng, Wei-Hong
    Zhou, Guan-Qun
    Lin, Li
    Hu, Jiang
    He, Wen-Jun
    Zhang, Lu-Lu
    Kou, Jia
    Ma, Jun
    Zhang, Wei-Dong
    Qi, Zhen-Yu
    Sun, Ying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : 124 - 131